Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Contribution of traits, phenology, & phylogenet...
Search
Scott Chamberlain
October 23, 2013
Science
0
83
Contribution of traits, phenology, & phylogenetic history to plant-pollinator network structure
Talk given at the Entomological Society of Canada meeting
Scott Chamberlain
October 23, 2013
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Scott Chamberlain
See All by Scott Chamberlain
Programmatic access for Altmetrics
myrmecocystus
1
110
Contribution of traits and phylogenetic history to plant-pollinator network
myrmecocystus
0
110
R Based tools for open and collaborative science
myrmecocystus
0
1.4k
Other Decks in Science
See All in Science
2025-06-11-ai_belgium
sofievl
1
120
機械学習 - 決定木からはじめる機械学習
trycycle
PRO
0
960
局所保存性・相似変換対称性を満たす機械学習モデルによる数値流体力学
yellowshippo
1
280
機械学習 - pandas入門
trycycle
PRO
0
260
オンプレミス環境にKubernetesを構築する
koukimiura
0
260
証明支援系LEANに入門しよう
unaoya
0
1.1k
機械学習 - ニューラルネットワーク入門
trycycle
PRO
0
790
SpatialBiologyWestCoastUS2024
lcolladotor
0
140
白金鉱業Meetup Vol.16_数理最適化案件のはじめかた・すすめかた
brainpadpr
3
1.8k
統計学入門講座 第4回スライド
techmathproject
0
140
SciPyDataJapan 2025
schwalbe10
0
240
テンソル分解による糖尿病の組織特異的遺伝子発現の統合解析を用いた関連疾患の予測
tagtag
2
190
Featured
See All Featured
Why You Should Never Use an ORM
jnunemaker
PRO
57
9.4k
Raft: Consensus for Rubyists
vanstee
140
7k
Docker and Python
trallard
44
3.4k
Producing Creativity
orderedlist
PRO
346
40k
Creating an realtime collaboration tool: Agile Flush - .NET Oxford
marcduiker
30
2.1k
KATA
mclloyd
29
14k
Unsuck your backbone
ammeep
671
58k
Mobile First: as difficult as doing things right
swwweet
223
9.7k
Principles of Awesome APIs and How to Build Them.
keavy
126
17k
The Cult of Friendly URLs
andyhume
79
6.5k
Into the Great Unknown - MozCon
thekraken
39
1.9k
Music & Morning Musume
bryan
46
6.6k
Transcript
Contribu)on of traits, phenology, & phylogene)c history to plant-‐
pollinator network structure Sco; Chamberlain Simon Fraser University
Thanks to! • Elizabeth Elle • Jana Vamosi
• Ralph Cartar • Sarah Semmler • Anne Worley • And many more that provided data…
Species in communi)es form networks
Pa;erns oLen similar among networks Plants Pollinators
Structure ma;ers Bascompte&Jordano2007AREES
What drives network structure?
Traits Body size
Phenology Emergence date Or Seasonal
ac)vity
Phylogene)c History
Traits Phenology Phylogene)c History
Study sites
Phylogeny Plants Pollinators
Species level metrics • Degree • Specializa)on (accounts
for interac)on intensity) • Within module degree • Among module connec)vity
Traits -‐ Pollinators • Nest loca)on: above/below ground -‐
NS • Nest type: excavator/renter -‐ NS • Parasi)c: yes/no -‐ NS
Traits -‐ Pollinators • Nest loca)on: above/below ground -‐
NS • Nest type: excavator/renter -‐ NS • Parasi)c: yes/no -‐ NS • Social: solitary/social – – Within module degree: social (module hubs), solitary (peripherals) – Among module connec)vity: social (connectors), solitary (peripherals) – Degree: social (higher), solitary (lower) • Body size – larger spp. w/ larger degree
Traits -‐ Plants • Breeding system –
Gynomonoecious: less specialized, higher degree – Hermaphrodites: more specialized, lower degree
Traits -‐ Plants • Breeding system –
Gynomonoecious: less specialized, higher degree – Hermaphrodites: more specialized, lower degree • Growth form – Herbaceous: lower within module degree – Woody: higher within module degree
Traits -‐ Plants • Breeding system –
Gynomonoecious: less specialized, higher degree – Hermaphrodites: more specialized, lower degree • Growth form – Herbaceous: lower within module degree – Woody: higher within module degree • Flower symmetry: – Bilateral: lower within module degree, lower degree – Radial: higher within module degree, higher degree • Flower size: smaller flowers higher within module degree
Network level network structure ~ FDisPO +
FDisPL + MPDPO + MPDPL
Network level network structure ~ FDisPO +
FDisPL + MPDPO + MPDPL 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.1 0.2 0.3 Modularity 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Connectance A B 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.1 0.2 0.3 Modularity 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.3 Pollinator FDis Connectance A B Pollinator Func)onal Trait Dispersion
Conclusion • Species level – Sociality important in pollinators
– Ma)ng systems, flower symmetry & growth form important in plants • Network level – At network level, é pollinator func)onal diversity w/ é modularity & ê connectance – Pollinator traits bigger drivers of network structure rela)ve to plants
Phenology • Species vary in when they start flowering
(plants) and start flying (pollinators) • Varia)on among species can lead to changes in network structure
HLG HLU OKG OKU SOG SOU WLG WLU cr1 cr2
fs1 fs2 go1 go2 mm1 mm2 mz1 mz2 sm1 sm2 AG BB−1 BB−2 BI CF−1 CF−2 CV DP LSCR OM PS−1 PS−2 TH 100 150 200 100 150 200 100 150 200 Julian day (days since 1 Jan)
Phenology is associated with structures
Robustness differs among groups Plants Pollinators • • •
• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • • • • • •• • • •• • • • • • •• • • • • •• • 0.4 0.6 0.8 • FJ FJr Plants Pollinators • • • • • • • • • •• •• • • •• • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 • D Dr Robustness
Phylogene)c tree shape • Shape easily measured •
Metrics represent whether – Branching events recent or old – Branching events even across tree, or some groups speciate more than others • Shape could influence who interacts with who
Shape correlated with network structure
Simula)ons suggest a causal link 0.68 0.70 0.72 0.74
0.72 0.76 Tree balance Distribu Brownian Motion −Burst Modularity
Traits Phenology Phylogene)c History
Thanks to • Elizabeth Elle • Jana Vamosi
• Ralph Cartar • Sarah Semmler • Anne Worley Silhoue;es: Phylopic.org h;p://phylopic.org/image/070c78bc-‐e075-‐4098-‐a66b-‐fca2f02680ea/