Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
Contribution of traits, phenology, & phylogenet...
Search
Scott Chamberlain
October 23, 2013
Science
0
83
Contribution of traits, phenology, & phylogenetic history to plant-pollinator network structure
Talk given at the Entomological Society of Canada meeting
Scott Chamberlain
October 23, 2013
Tweet
Share
More Decks by Scott Chamberlain
See All by Scott Chamberlain
Programmatic access for Altmetrics
myrmecocystus
1
110
Contribution of traits and phylogenetic history to plant-pollinator network
myrmecocystus
0
110
R Based tools for open and collaborative science
myrmecocystus
0
1.4k
Other Decks in Science
See All in Science
3次元点群を利用した植物の葉の自動セグメンテーションについて
kentaitakura
2
1.3k
生成検索エンジン最適化に関する研究の紹介
ynakano
2
1.1k
機械学習 - pandas入門
trycycle
PRO
0
270
07_浮世満理子_アイディア高等学院学院長_一般社団法人全国心理業連合会代表理事_紹介資料.pdf
sip3ristex
0
480
MCMCのR-hatは分散分析である
moricup
0
370
地質研究者が苦労しながら運用する情報公開システムの実例
naito2000
0
210
IWASAKI Hideo
genomethica
0
110
データベース10: 拡張実体関連モデル
trycycle
PRO
0
690
Online Feedback Optimization
floriandoerfler
0
2.2k
2025-06-11-ai_belgium
sofievl
1
130
06_浅井雄一郎_株式会社浅井農園代表取締役社長_紹介資料.pdf
sip3ristex
0
500
データベース03: 関係データモデル
trycycle
PRO
1
120
Featured
See All Featured
Raft: Consensus for Rubyists
vanstee
140
7k
The Power of CSS Pseudo Elements
geoffreycrofte
77
5.8k
Facilitating Awesome Meetings
lara
54
6.4k
BBQ
matthewcrist
89
9.7k
Let's Do A Bunch of Simple Stuff to Make Websites Faster
chriscoyier
507
140k
Automating Front-end Workflow
addyosmani
1370
200k
How to train your dragon (web standard)
notwaldorf
94
6.1k
Testing 201, or: Great Expectations
jmmastey
42
7.6k
Statistics for Hackers
jakevdp
799
220k
I Don’t Have Time: Getting Over the Fear to Launch Your Podcast
jcasabona
32
2.4k
Bootstrapping a Software Product
garrettdimon
PRO
307
110k
Writing Fast Ruby
sferik
628
62k
Transcript
Contribu)on of traits, phenology, & phylogene)c history to plant-‐
pollinator network structure Sco; Chamberlain Simon Fraser University
Thanks to! • Elizabeth Elle • Jana Vamosi
• Ralph Cartar • Sarah Semmler • Anne Worley • And many more that provided data…
Species in communi)es form networks
Pa;erns oLen similar among networks Plants Pollinators
Structure ma;ers Bascompte&Jordano2007AREES
What drives network structure?
Traits Body size
Phenology Emergence date Or Seasonal
ac)vity
Phylogene)c History
Traits Phenology Phylogene)c History
Study sites
Phylogeny Plants Pollinators
Species level metrics • Degree • Specializa)on (accounts
for interac)on intensity) • Within module degree • Among module connec)vity
Traits -‐ Pollinators • Nest loca)on: above/below ground -‐
NS • Nest type: excavator/renter -‐ NS • Parasi)c: yes/no -‐ NS
Traits -‐ Pollinators • Nest loca)on: above/below ground -‐
NS • Nest type: excavator/renter -‐ NS • Parasi)c: yes/no -‐ NS • Social: solitary/social – – Within module degree: social (module hubs), solitary (peripherals) – Among module connec)vity: social (connectors), solitary (peripherals) – Degree: social (higher), solitary (lower) • Body size – larger spp. w/ larger degree
Traits -‐ Plants • Breeding system –
Gynomonoecious: less specialized, higher degree – Hermaphrodites: more specialized, lower degree
Traits -‐ Plants • Breeding system –
Gynomonoecious: less specialized, higher degree – Hermaphrodites: more specialized, lower degree • Growth form – Herbaceous: lower within module degree – Woody: higher within module degree
Traits -‐ Plants • Breeding system –
Gynomonoecious: less specialized, higher degree – Hermaphrodites: more specialized, lower degree • Growth form – Herbaceous: lower within module degree – Woody: higher within module degree • Flower symmetry: – Bilateral: lower within module degree, lower degree – Radial: higher within module degree, higher degree • Flower size: smaller flowers higher within module degree
Network level network structure ~ FDisPO +
FDisPL + MPDPO + MPDPL
Network level network structure ~ FDisPO +
FDisPL + MPDPO + MPDPL 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.1 0.2 0.3 Modularity 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Connectance A B 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.1 0.2 0.3 Modularity 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.3 Pollinator FDis Connectance A B Pollinator Func)onal Trait Dispersion
Conclusion • Species level – Sociality important in pollinators
– Ma)ng systems, flower symmetry & growth form important in plants • Network level – At network level, é pollinator func)onal diversity w/ é modularity & ê connectance – Pollinator traits bigger drivers of network structure rela)ve to plants
Phenology • Species vary in when they start flowering
(plants) and start flying (pollinators) • Varia)on among species can lead to changes in network structure
HLG HLU OKG OKU SOG SOU WLG WLU cr1 cr2
fs1 fs2 go1 go2 mm1 mm2 mz1 mz2 sm1 sm2 AG BB−1 BB−2 BI CF−1 CF−2 CV DP LSCR OM PS−1 PS−2 TH 100 150 200 100 150 200 100 150 200 Julian day (days since 1 Jan)
Phenology is associated with structures
Robustness differs among groups Plants Pollinators • • •
• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • • • • • •• • • •• • • • • • •• • • • • •• • 0.4 0.6 0.8 • FJ FJr Plants Pollinators • • • • • • • • • •• •• • • •• • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 • D Dr Robustness
Phylogene)c tree shape • Shape easily measured •
Metrics represent whether – Branching events recent or old – Branching events even across tree, or some groups speciate more than others • Shape could influence who interacts with who
Shape correlated with network structure
Simula)ons suggest a causal link 0.68 0.70 0.72 0.74
0.72 0.76 Tree balance Distribu Brownian Motion −Burst Modularity
Traits Phenology Phylogene)c History
Thanks to • Elizabeth Elle • Jana Vamosi
• Ralph Cartar • Sarah Semmler • Anne Worley Silhoue;es: Phylopic.org h;p://phylopic.org/image/070c78bc-‐e075-‐4098-‐a66b-‐fca2f02680ea/