Data Services in Universities and Journals (W. Horstmann, 2nd Data Management Workshop in Cologne, Köln, 28.11.2014)

Transcript

1. [Anlass der Präsentation] Data Services in Universities and Journals Wolfram Horstmann
2. [Anlass der Präsentation] Brave new world of research data
3. [Anlass der Präsentation] Research data stakeholders Data Governments Research Institutions Funders Publishers Researchers
4. [Anlass der Präsentation] RDM POLICIES
5. [Anlass der Präsentation] Project Policy: Human Genome Project 1996
6. [Anlass der Präsentation] Funder Policy: DFG 1998 Recommendation 7: Primary data as the basis for publications shall be securely stored for ten years in a durable form in the institution of their origin.
7. [Anlass der Präsentation] Project policy: Tools 2001
8. [Anlass der Präsentation] Funder Policy: US NIH 2002
9. [Anlass der Präsentation] Journal Policy, e.g. NAR 2003 (?)
10. [Anlass der Präsentation] Funder Policy: CRCs 2010ff
11. [Anlass der Präsentation] Funder Policy: EPSRC 2011
12. [Anlass der Präsentation] Funder Policy: many… 2012
13. [Anlass der Präsentation] Institutional Policy: e.g. Edinburgh 2011
14. [Anlass der Präsentation] Funder Policy: EC 2012
15. [Anlass der Präsentation] Government Policy: e.g. UK 2012
16. [Anlass der Präsentation] International Policy, e.g. G8 2013
17. [Anlass der Präsentation] Service Policy: Dryad
18. [Anlass der Präsentation] Service Policy: Figshare
19. [Anlass der Präsentation] Service Policy: Scientific Data
20. [Anlass der Präsentation] WHAT INSTITUTIONS CAN DO
21. [Anlass der Präsentation] Look at National Initiatives
22. [Anlass der Präsentation] Look at Libraries Practice CASE STUDIES OF RESEARCH DATA MANAGEMENT IN UNIVERSITIES
23. [Anlass der Präsentation] Look at University Policy
24. [Anlass der Präsentation] Engage in Expert Conversations
25. [Anlass der Präsentation] Refer to Existing Repositories
26. [Anlass der Präsentation] UNIVERSITY EXAMPLE: BIELEFELD
27. [Anlass der Präsentation] RDM Principles
28. [Anlass der Präsentation] Central RDM Activities • Research Data Policy: “Principles” • Coordination post funded by the University • Focus group with leading academics • Colloquium Knowledge Infrastructure • Library in close cooperation with IT – Library provides curation and metadata support – IT Services provide servers and storage
29. [Anlass der Präsentation] Centrally Supported RDM actvitity • Data-Service Centre “Business and Organisational Data” • Infrastructure for Collaborative Research Project (50PIs, 12 Years) “From Heterogeneity to Inequality” • Excellence Cluster “Cognitive Interaction Robotics” (100PIs, 10 years) • Library Services: metadata, DOIs, software, calendars, websites… • Storage and housing in IT Services
30. [Anlass der Präsentation]
31. [Anlass der Präsentation]
32. [Anlass der Präsentation]
33. [Anlass der Präsentation] RDM Resolution
34. [Anlass der Präsentation] Institutional Repository
35. [Anlass der Präsentation] Institutional Repository
36. [Anlass der Präsentation] Institutional Repository
37. [Anlass der Präsentation] UNIVERSITY EXAMPLE: OXFORD
38. [Anlass der Präsentation] RDM Policy
39. [Anlass der Präsentation] RDM Working Group • Chaired by PVC-R • Representation of many stakeholders – Divisions – Libraries – IT Services – Research Services • Many external and departmental activities • Central services as fall-back
40. [Anlass der Präsentation] Multi-Agency Initiative
41. [Anlass der Präsentation] RDM Website
42. [Anlass der Präsentation] Institutional Repository: ORA-Data
43. [Anlass der Präsentation] UNIVERSITY EXAMPLE: GÖTTINGEN
44. [Anlass der Präsentation] Information Infrastructure at the Göttingen Campus • Göttingen Campus • IT Services: GWDG • State and University Library Göttingen: SUB • Research Data Policy • Göttingen eResearch Alliance – Building on a strong tradition of collaboration – Sustainable Support at Seleceted Points in the Research Lifecycle – Consultations for Project Proposals – Pooling Infrastructure Specialists – Training, IT Support, Publication Services, Research Data and Software
45. [Anlass der Präsentation] Building the Göttingen eResearch Alliance Library Göttingen Campus Partners IT Services University Collections Faculties and Institutes Centre for Digital Humanities Humanities Data Centre International Partners Collaboration # Project Consultancy Research Data Services Staff Pooling Training Software Development Publication Services Services International Information Infrastructure
46. [Anlass der Präsentation] JOURNAL EXAMPLE: NATURE
47. [Anlass der Präsentation]
48. [Anlass der Präsentation] JOURNAL EXAMPLE: SCIENTIFIC DATA
49. [Anlass der Präsentation]
50. [Anlass der Präsentation] JOURNAL EXAMPLE: F1000 RESEARCH
51. [Anlass der Präsentation] Institutional Repositories General Terms Hosting
52. [Anlass der Präsentation] SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
53. [Anlass der Präsentation] We Need Data Libraries • Post-hoc Data Library: derived from a longstanding history of librarianship – Strenghts: service reputation, recurrent funds and a profession behind it – Weakness: little subject-specific expertise • Ad-hoc Data Library: derived from urgent needs in (research) practice – Strength: built on outstanding subject-specific expertise – Weakness: service not always culture of research, no recurrent funding • However, there are many hybrids – The physical data library is about virtual data services – The virtual data library will need a physical infrastructure [Anlass der Präsentation]
54. [Anlass der Präsentation] We Need Data Libraries • How? 1. apply collaboration spirit between Researchers, Libraries, IT Service, Institutions, Funders and Publishers 2. jointly work on a ‚funded‘ policy 3. focus on the record of research, i.e. links between data and literature 4. focus on the added value of the individual researcher
55. [Anlass der Präsentation] Research Data Stakeholder Contributions Research Data Governments Research Institutions Funders Publishers Researchers Funding
56. [Anlass der Präsentation] THANKS