Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Sign up for free
Menu
Search
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Pricing
Search
Sign in
Sign up for free
Counterfactual learning to rank: introduction
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Daiki Tanaka
May 02, 2020
Research
900
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Counterfactual learning to rank: introduction
一般的なランキング学習からcounterfactual LTRへの導入
Daiki Tanaka
May 02, 2020
More Decks by Daiki Tanaka
See All by Daiki Tanaka
カーネル法概観
daikitanak
0
760
カーネル法:正定値カーネルの理論
daikitanak
0
89
[Paper reading] L-SHAPLEY AND C-SHAPLEY: EFFICIENT MODEL INTERPRETATION FOR STRUCTURED DATA
daikitanak
1
220
[Paper Reading] Attention is All You Need
daikitanak
0
140
Interpretability of Machine Learning : Paper reading (LIME)
daikitanak
0
190
[Paper reading] Local Outlier Detection With Interpretation
daikitanak
0
94
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
La génomique au service de la fromageabilité du lait grâce aux spectres MIR
institutdelelevage
PRO
0
180
Language and AI
ayaniwa
0
320
Model Predictive Control for Uncertain Systems: Robust & Data-Driven Designs
kohlerjohannes
0
160
最先端NLP勉強会2026 論文紹介:Reasoning with Sampling: Your Base Model is Smarter Than You Think (ICLR 2026 paper)
kogoro
4
710
TESSERA: Temporal Embeddings of Surface Spectra for Earth Representation and Analysis
satai
3
110
PHTalks Bengaluru - SSRF When All Else Fails
dk999
0
1.2k
完全自律LLMエージェントでDIVER OSINT CTF 2026に挑戦してみた
analokmaus
0
760
IA for theory
gpeyre
1
490
Evaluating LLM Reliability Across Facts, Evidence, and Cultures
yukiar
0
200
ハードウェア研究で国際トップ会議を目指す!IROS 2027での論文採択を目指して
ayatokanada
7
4k
LA-Bench 2025:実験指示から実行可能手順を生成するためのデータセット/LA-Bench 2025: A Dataset for Generating Executable Experimental Procedures from Experimental Instructions
stktu
0
200
論文読み会 SNLP2026 Tau2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment
s_mizuki_nlp
0
300
Featured
See All Featured
Kristin Tynski - Automating Marketing Tasks With AI
techseoconnect
PRO
0
550
No one is an island. Learnings from fostering a developers community.
thoeni
21
3.9k
Highjacked: Video Game Concept Design
rkendrick25
PRO
1
480
The State of eCommerce SEO: How to Win in Today's Products SERPs - #SEOweek
aleyda
2
12k
How to Get Subject Matter Experts Bought In and Actively Contributing to SEO & PR Initiatives.
livdayseo
0
210
Building a Scalable Design System with Sketch
lauravandoore
464
34k
Code Reviewing Like a Champion
maltzj
529
40k
Refactoring Trust on Your Teams (GOTO; Chicago 2020)
rmw
35
3.8k
The Director’s Chair: Orchestrating AI for Truly Effective Learning
tmiket
1
330
Performance Is Good for Brains [We Love Speed 2024]
tammyeverts
12
1.9k
Distributed Sagas: A Protocol for Coordinating Microservices
caitiem20
333
23k
The Power of CSS Pseudo Elements
geoffreycrofte
82
6.6k
Transcript
Unbiased Learning to Rank May 7, 2020
Learning to rank ઃఆ Supervised LTR Pointwise loss Pairwise loss
Listtwise loss Counterfactual Learning to Rank Counterfactual Evaluation Inverse Propensity Scoring Propensity-weighted Learning to Rank 2
Learning to rank: ઃఆ ೖྗɿ จॻͷू߹ D ग़ྗɿ จॻͷॱҐ R
= (R1; R2; R3:::) ͨͩ͠ɺ֤จॻʹϞσϧ f„ ʹΑͬͯείΞ͕͍͍ͭͯͯ f„ (R1) – f„ (R2) – f„ (R3) ::: ͱͳ͍ͬͯΔɻ(ߴ͍είΞ͕͚ΒΕΔ΄ͲॱҐ͕ߴ͍) Learning to Rank (LTR) ͷత࠷దͳॱҐΛग़ྗ͢ΔϞσϧ f„ ͷύϥϝʔλ „ Λ σʔλ͔ΒٻΊΔ͜ͱɻ 3
Supervised LTR ڭࢣ͋Γ LTR Ͱɺ › ݕࡧΫΤϦ › จॻू߹ ›
ॱҐͷϥϕϧ ΛؚΉσʔληοτΛͬͯϞσϧύϥϝʔλΛٻΊΔɻ ڭࢣ͋Γ LTR Ͱ༻͍ΒΕΔଛࣦओʹ 3 ͭɿ › Pointwise loss › Pairwise loss › Listwise loss y (d) ʹΑͬͯɺจॻ d ͷݕࡧΫΤϦͷؔ࿈Λද͢ͱ͢Δɻ(େ͖͍΄ͲॱҐͷ্Ґʹ ͖ͯཉ͍͠) 4
Pointwise loss Pointwise loss ɺॱҐͷਪఆΛྨɾճؼͱͯ͠ղ͘ɻྫ͑ɺ௨ৗͷճؼଛࣦ (squared loss) ͱͯ͠ҎԼͷΑ͏ʹ༩͑Δɿ Lpointwise :=
1 N N X i=1 (f„ (di) ` y (di))2 Pointwise loss ͷɺϞσϧͷग़ྗΛॱҐͱͯ͠͏͜ͱΛߟྀʹೖΕ͍ͯͳ͍͜ ͱɻLTR Ͱग़ྗͱͯ͠ಘΒΕΔείΞΛฒͼସ͑ͯಘΒΕΔॱҐʹͷΈؔ৺͕͋Δɻ 5
Pairwise loss Pairwise loss Ͱɺ2 ͭͷจॻؒͷ૬ରతͳείΞͷେখΛߟྀʹ͍ΕΔɻྫ͑ɺҎԼ ͷΑ͏ͳ hinge-loss Λ༩͑Δʀ Lpairwise
:= X y(di)>y(dj) max (0; 1 ` (f„ (di) ` f„ (di))): ॱҐ͕૬ରతʹߴ͍จॻείΞ͕ߴ͘ɺॱҐ͕͍จॻείΞΛ͘͢Δؾ࣋ͪɻ Pairwise loss ͷɺશͯͷهࣄϖΞΛಉ༷ʹѻ͏͜ͱɻ࣮ͦͯ͠༻্ top100 ͱ top10 ޙऀͷํ͕ॏࢹ͞ΕΔ͜ͱɻPairwise loss Ͱ top100 ͷԼͷํͷॱҐΛվળ ͤ͞ΔͨΊʹ্ҐͷॱҐΛ٘ਜ਼ʹ͢Δ͜ͱ͕͋Γ͑ͯ͠·͏ɻ 6
Listwise loss Listwise loss ͰॱҐࢦඪΛ࠷దԽ͢Δɻ՝ɺॱҐࢦඪ͕ඍՄೳͰͳ͍͜ͱɻ ྫ͑ɺDCG ɿ DCG = N
X i=1 y (di) log2 (rank (di) + 1) Ͱ͋Δ͕ɺlog2 (rank (di) + 1) ඍෆՄೳͰ͋Δɻ ͦͷͨΊʹ֬తۙࣅΛ༻͍Δํ๏ (ListNetɺListMLE) ɺώϡʔϦεςΟοΫॱҐ ࢦඪͷόϯυΛ࠷దԽ͢Δख๏͕͋Δɻ(LambdaRankɺLambdaLoss) ྫ͑ɺ LambdaRank ͷଛࣦ DCG ͷόϯυͱͳ͍ͬͯΔɿ LLambdaRank := X y(di)>y(dj) log (1 + exp (f„ (dj) ` f„ (di))) j´DCGj 7
ҼՌධՁ తɿ৽͍͠ϥϯΩϯάؔ f„ ΛɺผͷϥϯΩϯάؔ fdeploy ͷԼͰूΊΒΕͨաڈ ͷσʔλ (ΫϦοΫσʔλͳͲ) ΛͬͯධՁ͍ͨ͠ɻ ҎԼͷ
2 ͭͷ߹ʹ͍ͭͯߟ͑Δɻ › શͯͷจॻʹ͍ͭͯਅͷؔ࿈ y (di) ͕طͰ͋Δ࣌ › y (di) Θ͔Βͳ͍͕ɺΫϦοΫใͳͲͷ҉తͳϑΟʔυόοΫͷΈར༻Մೳͳ࣌ 8
ҼՌධՁɿϥϕϧ͕طͳΒશʹධՁ͕Ͱ͖Δ શͯͷจॻʹ͍ͭͯਅͷϥϕϧ y (di) ͕طͰ͋Δ࣌ɺIR(ใݕࡧ) ࢦඪΛܭࢉͰ͖Δɿ ´ (f„; D; y)
= X di2D – (rank (di j f„; D)) ´ y (di) ͜͜Ͱɺ– ॱҐॏΈ͚ؔͰ͋ͬͯɺྫ͑ɿ APR: – (r) = r DCG: – (r) = 1 log2 (1+r) ͳͲ͕༻͍ΒΕΔɻ 9
ҼՌධՁ y (di) Θ͔Βͳ͍͕ɺΫϦοΫใͳͲͷ҉తͳϑΟʔυόοΫͷΈར༻Մೳͳ࣌ɿ › ͋Δจॻʹର͢ΔΫϦοΫɺͦͷจॻ͕ؔ࿈͍ͯ͠Δ͜ͱΛࣔ͢ɺόΠΞεɾϊΠζ ͖ͭͷࢦඪʹͳ͍ͬͯΔɻ › ΫϦοΫ͞Εͳ͔͔ͬͨΒͱ͍ͬͯͦͷจॻ͕ؔͳ͍Θ͚Ͱͳ͍ɻ(จॻ͕ؔͳ ͍ɾϢʔβ͕จॻΛ؍ଌ͍ͯ͠ͳ͍ɾϥϯμϜཁૉʹΑΔͷ)
ଟ͘ͷ؍ଌσʔλʹ͍ͭͯฏۉΛऔΕϊΠζআڈͰ͖Δͱߟ͑ΒΕΔ͕ɺόΠΞεআ ڈͰ͖ͳ͍ɻ 10
ҼՌධՁɿ؍ଌɾΫϦοΫϞσϧ Ϣʔβͷ؍ଌٴͼจॻͷؔ࿈ͷΈΛߟྀʹೖΕΔͱɺϢʔβͷΫϦοΫҎԼͷΑ͏ʹϞ σϦϯάͰ͖ͦ͏ɿ › ϥϯΩϯά R ʹ͓͍ͯจॻ di ͕؍ଌ͞ΕΔ (oi
= 1 Ͱද͢) ֬ɺ P (oi = 1 j R; di) (؍ଌ͞ΕΔ֬ؔ࿈ʹؔͳ͍ͱԾఆ͍ͯ͠Δɻ) › ؔ࿈ y (di) ͱ؍ଌ oi ͕༩͑ΒΕͨ࣌ͷɺจॻ di ͕ΫϦοΫ͞ΕΔ֬ (ci = 1 Ͱද͢) ɺ P (ci = 1 j oi; y (di)) › ΫϦοΫ؍ଌ͞Εͨจॻʹ͔͠ى͜Βͳ͍ͨΊɺϥϯΩϯά R ʹ͓͍ͯΫϦοΫ͞ ΕΔ֬ɿ P (ci = 1 ^ oi = 1 j y (di) ; R) = P (ci = 1 j oi = 1; y (di)) ´ P (oi = 1 j R; di) 11
ҼՌධՁɿ´ (f„; D; y) ͷφΠʔϒਪఆ ´ (f„; D; y) ΛφΠʔϒʹਪఆ͢ΔʹɺΫϦοΫͷใ
(ci) Λਅͷؔ࿈ϥϕϧ (y (di)) ͷΘΓʹ͑Αͯ͘ɺ ´NAIVE (f„; D; c) := X di2D – (rank (di j f„; D)) ´ ci ͱͳΔɻ ΫϦοΫʹϊΠζ͕͍ͬͯͳ͍࣌ɺͭ·Γ P (ci = 1 j oi = 1; y (di)) = y (di) Ͱ͋Δ࣌Ͱ͑͞ɺφΠʔϒਪఆ؍ଌόΠΞεΛड͚͍ͯΔɿ Eo ˆ´NAIVE (f„; D; c)˜ = Eo 2 4 X di2D – (rank (di j f„; D)) ´ ci 3 5 = Eo 2 6 4 X di:oi=1^y(di)=1 – (rank (di j f„; D)) 3 7 5 = X di:y(di)=1 P (oi = 1 j R; di)– (rank (di j f„; D)) = X di2D P (oi = 1 j R; di)– (rank (di j f„; D)) ´ y (di) 12
ҼՌධՁɿ´ (f„; D; y) ͷφΠʔϒਪఆ φΠʔϒਪఆɿ Eo ˆ´NAIVE (f„; D;
c)˜ = X di:y(di)=1 P (oi = 1 j R; di)– (rank (di j f„; D)) ͰɺͦΕͧΕͷจॻͷɺϩάऩू࣌ͷϥϯΩϯά R Ͱͷ؍ଌ֬ͰॏΈͨ͠ਪఆʹͳͬ ͯ͠·͏ɻ ϥϯΩϯάͰɺߴॱҐͷจॻ΄Ͳ؍ଌ͞Ε͍͢ɿ͜ΕΛ position bias ͱݺͿɻϩάऩ ूͷࡍʹߴॱҐʹදࣔ͞Εͨจॻਅͷؔ࿈ΑΓؔ࿈͕͋ΔɺͱόΠΞεΛड͚ͯ͠· ͏ɻ όΠΞεΛআڈ͢ΔͨΊʹɺP (oi = 1 j R; di) Λਪఆ͠ɺิਖ਼ͯ͋͛͠Εྑͦ͞͏ ! είΞʹΑΔόΠΞεআڈ 13
είΞΛ༻͍ͨόΠΞεআڈ Inverse Propensity Scoring(IPS) ʹΑͬͯόΠΞεΛআڈ͢Δɿ ´IPS (f„; D; c) :=
X di2D – (rank (di j f„; D)) P (oi = 1 j R; di) ´ ci ͜͜ͰɺP (oi = 1 j R; di) ϩάऩूதʹදࣔ͞ΕͨϥϯΩϯά R Ͱจॻ di ͕؍ଌ͞ ΕΔ֬Ͱ͋Δɻ´IPS (f„; D; c) ΫϦοΫϊΠζ͕ͳ͍߹ɺͭ·Γ P (ci = 1 j oi = 1; y (di)) = y (di) Ͱ͋Δ࣌ʹ ´ (f„; D; y) ͷෆภਪఆྔͰ͋Δɿ Eo ˆ´IPS (f„; D; c)˜ = Eo 2 4 X di2D – (rank (di j f„; D)) P (oi = 1 j R; di) ´ ci 3 5 = Eo 2 6 4 X di:oi=1^y(di)=1 – (rank (di j f„; D)) P (oi = 1 j R; di) 3 7 5 = X di:y(di)=1 P (oi = 1 j R; di) ´ – (rank (di j f„; D)) P (oi = 1 j R; di) = X di2D – (rank (di j f„; D)) ´ y (di) = ´ (f„; D; y) : 14
Propensity-weighted LTR IPS ´ (f„; D; y) ͷෆภਪఆͰ͋ͬͨɻΑͬͯɺ࠷దͳϞσϧύϥϝʔλ „
IPS Λ ࠷దԽ͢Δ͜ͱͰٻΊΔ͜ͱ͕Ͱ͖ΔɻIPS Λ࠷దԽ͢ΔࡍɺϥϯΩϯάࢦඪ – (r) ͷඍ ෆՄೳੑʹରॲ͢ΔͨΊɺ– (r) ͷ bound Λར༻͢Δɻ Propensity-weighted LTR ͷྲྀΕɿ › ΫϦοΫͷείΞΛਪఆɿ P (oi = 1 j R; di) › ෆภਪఆྔ ´IPS (f„; D; c) ͷ bound ʹ͍ͭͯඍΛܭࢉɿ „0 = r„ "– (rank (di j f„; D)) P (oi = 1 j R; di) # › ϞσϧύϥϝʔλΛߋ৽ „new „old ` „0 15
References › https://ilps.github.io/webconf2020-tutorial-unbiased-ltr/ 16