Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Sign up for free
Menu
Search
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Features
All features
Private URLs
Password Protection
Custom URLS
Scheduled publishing
Remove Branding
Restrict embedding
Deck Collections
Notes
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Explore
Featured decks
Featured speakers
Programming
Technology
Storyboards
Pricing
Search
Sign in
Sign up for free
Counterfactual learning to rank: introduction
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Daiki Tanaka
May 02, 2020
Research
900
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
Counterfactual learning to rank: introduction
一般的なランキング学習からcounterfactual LTRへの導入
Daiki Tanaka
May 02, 2020
More Decks by Daiki Tanaka
See All by Daiki Tanaka
カーネル法概観
daikitanak
0
750
カーネル法:正定値カーネルの理論
daikitanak
0
85
[Paper reading] L-SHAPLEY AND C-SHAPLEY: EFFICIENT MODEL INTERPRETATION FOR STRUCTURED DATA
daikitanak
1
210
[Paper Reading] Attention is All You Need
daikitanak
0
130
Interpretability of Machine Learning : Paper reading (LIME)
daikitanak
0
180
[Paper reading] Local Outlier Detection With Interpretation
daikitanak
0
89
Other Decks in Research
See All in Research
Google Cloud Next 2026 DM Recap Agentic Data Cloudを添えて / Google Cloud Next 2026 DM Recap
nnaka2992
0
140
論文紹介:Doc-to-LoRA: Learning to Instantly Internalize Contexts
yukako_nakano
0
180
Sleuthcon Keynote - How Cybercriminals (ab)use AI
fr0gger
0
330
SoftMatcha 2: 1兆語規模コーパスの超高速かつ柔らかい検索
e869120_sub
7
3.9k
Physical AIでモデリングはどう変わるか/How Physical AI Will Change Modeling
stktu
0
260
秋葉原ウォーカブル基礎調査報告書
izumiyama_lab
1
120
LLM の Attention 機構まとめ — 数式・計算量・メモリ
puwaer
8
2.7k
2025年度秋葉原ウォーカブルプロジェクト調査報告 「アキバらしいウォーカブル」とは何か
izumiyama_lab
1
220
ros2-perf-multihost: 分散システムにおける客観的なアーキテクチャ評価フレームワーク
takasehideki
0
270
SLAMはどこまで解決されたのか?
tomonom
0
1.4k
HAKARI-Bench - 実運用視点での情報検索モデル評価ベンチマーク
hotchpotch
1
760
Karkada さんの論文 × 2 の紹介: (1) Closed-Form Training Dynamics Reveal Learned Features and Linear Structure in Word2Vec-like Models, (2) Symmetry in language statistics shapes the geometry of model representations
eumesy
PRO
1
750
Featured
See All Featured
Bridging the Design Gap: How Collaborative Modelling removes blockers to flow between stakeholders and teams @FastFlow conf
baasie
0
700
The Pragmatic Product Professional
lauravandoore
37
7.4k
The Hidden Cost of Media on the Web [PixelPalooza 2025]
tammyeverts
2
500
Neural Spatial Audio Processing for Sound Field Analysis and Control
skoyamalab
0
510
Reflections from 52 weeks, 52 projects
jeffersonlam
356
21k
A Modern Web Designer's Workflow
chriscoyier
699
190k
Technical Leadership for Architectural Decision Making
baasie
3
570
Crafting Experiences
bethany
1
350
Why You Should Never Use an ORM
jnunemaker
PRO
61
10k
Pawsitive SEO: Lessons from My Dog (and Many Mistakes) on Thriving as a Consultant in the Age of AI
davidcarrasco
0
250
Agile Actions for Facilitating Distributed Teams - ADO2019
mkilby
0
280
Save Time (by Creating Custom Rails Generators)
garrettdimon
PRO
32
4.9k
Transcript
Unbiased Learning to Rank May 7, 2020
Learning to rank ઃఆ Supervised LTR Pointwise loss Pairwise loss
Listtwise loss Counterfactual Learning to Rank Counterfactual Evaluation Inverse Propensity Scoring Propensity-weighted Learning to Rank 2
Learning to rank: ઃఆ ೖྗɿ จॻͷू߹ D ग़ྗɿ จॻͷॱҐ R
= (R1; R2; R3:::) ͨͩ͠ɺ֤จॻʹϞσϧ f„ ʹΑͬͯείΞ͕͍͍ͭͯͯ f„ (R1) – f„ (R2) – f„ (R3) ::: ͱͳ͍ͬͯΔɻ(ߴ͍είΞ͕͚ΒΕΔ΄ͲॱҐ͕ߴ͍) Learning to Rank (LTR) ͷత࠷దͳॱҐΛग़ྗ͢ΔϞσϧ f„ ͷύϥϝʔλ „ Λ σʔλ͔ΒٻΊΔ͜ͱɻ 3
Supervised LTR ڭࢣ͋Γ LTR Ͱɺ › ݕࡧΫΤϦ › จॻू߹ ›
ॱҐͷϥϕϧ ΛؚΉσʔληοτΛͬͯϞσϧύϥϝʔλΛٻΊΔɻ ڭࢣ͋Γ LTR Ͱ༻͍ΒΕΔଛࣦओʹ 3 ͭɿ › Pointwise loss › Pairwise loss › Listwise loss y (d) ʹΑͬͯɺจॻ d ͷݕࡧΫΤϦͷؔ࿈Λද͢ͱ͢Δɻ(େ͖͍΄ͲॱҐͷ্Ґʹ ͖ͯཉ͍͠) 4
Pointwise loss Pointwise loss ɺॱҐͷਪఆΛྨɾճؼͱͯ͠ղ͘ɻྫ͑ɺ௨ৗͷճؼଛࣦ (squared loss) ͱͯ͠ҎԼͷΑ͏ʹ༩͑Δɿ Lpointwise :=
1 N N X i=1 (f„ (di) ` y (di))2 Pointwise loss ͷɺϞσϧͷग़ྗΛॱҐͱͯ͠͏͜ͱΛߟྀʹೖΕ͍ͯͳ͍͜ ͱɻLTR Ͱग़ྗͱͯ͠ಘΒΕΔείΞΛฒͼସ͑ͯಘΒΕΔॱҐʹͷΈؔ৺͕͋Δɻ 5
Pairwise loss Pairwise loss Ͱɺ2 ͭͷจॻؒͷ૬ରతͳείΞͷେখΛߟྀʹ͍ΕΔɻྫ͑ɺҎԼ ͷΑ͏ͳ hinge-loss Λ༩͑Δʀ Lpairwise
:= X y(di)>y(dj) max (0; 1 ` (f„ (di) ` f„ (di))): ॱҐ͕૬ରతʹߴ͍จॻείΞ͕ߴ͘ɺॱҐ͕͍จॻείΞΛ͘͢Δؾ࣋ͪɻ Pairwise loss ͷɺશͯͷهࣄϖΞΛಉ༷ʹѻ͏͜ͱɻ࣮ͦͯ͠༻্ top100 ͱ top10 ޙऀͷํ͕ॏࢹ͞ΕΔ͜ͱɻPairwise loss Ͱ top100 ͷԼͷํͷॱҐΛվળ ͤ͞ΔͨΊʹ্ҐͷॱҐΛ٘ਜ਼ʹ͢Δ͜ͱ͕͋Γ͑ͯ͠·͏ɻ 6
Listwise loss Listwise loss ͰॱҐࢦඪΛ࠷దԽ͢Δɻ՝ɺॱҐࢦඪ͕ඍՄೳͰͳ͍͜ͱɻ ྫ͑ɺDCG ɿ DCG = N
X i=1 y (di) log2 (rank (di) + 1) Ͱ͋Δ͕ɺlog2 (rank (di) + 1) ඍෆՄೳͰ͋Δɻ ͦͷͨΊʹ֬తۙࣅΛ༻͍Δํ๏ (ListNetɺListMLE) ɺώϡʔϦεςΟοΫॱҐ ࢦඪͷόϯυΛ࠷దԽ͢Δख๏͕͋Δɻ(LambdaRankɺLambdaLoss) ྫ͑ɺ LambdaRank ͷଛࣦ DCG ͷόϯυͱͳ͍ͬͯΔɿ LLambdaRank := X y(di)>y(dj) log (1 + exp (f„ (dj) ` f„ (di))) j´DCGj 7
ҼՌධՁ తɿ৽͍͠ϥϯΩϯάؔ f„ ΛɺผͷϥϯΩϯάؔ fdeploy ͷԼͰूΊΒΕͨաڈ ͷσʔλ (ΫϦοΫσʔλͳͲ) ΛͬͯධՁ͍ͨ͠ɻ ҎԼͷ
2 ͭͷ߹ʹ͍ͭͯߟ͑Δɻ › શͯͷจॻʹ͍ͭͯਅͷؔ࿈ y (di) ͕طͰ͋Δ࣌ › y (di) Θ͔Βͳ͍͕ɺΫϦοΫใͳͲͷ҉తͳϑΟʔυόοΫͷΈར༻Մೳͳ࣌ 8
ҼՌධՁɿϥϕϧ͕طͳΒશʹධՁ͕Ͱ͖Δ શͯͷจॻʹ͍ͭͯਅͷϥϕϧ y (di) ͕طͰ͋Δ࣌ɺIR(ใݕࡧ) ࢦඪΛܭࢉͰ͖Δɿ ´ (f„; D; y)
= X di2D – (rank (di j f„; D)) ´ y (di) ͜͜Ͱɺ– ॱҐॏΈ͚ؔͰ͋ͬͯɺྫ͑ɿ APR: – (r) = r DCG: – (r) = 1 log2 (1+r) ͳͲ͕༻͍ΒΕΔɻ 9
ҼՌධՁ y (di) Θ͔Βͳ͍͕ɺΫϦοΫใͳͲͷ҉తͳϑΟʔυόοΫͷΈར༻Մೳͳ࣌ɿ › ͋Δจॻʹର͢ΔΫϦοΫɺͦͷจॻ͕ؔ࿈͍ͯ͠Δ͜ͱΛࣔ͢ɺόΠΞεɾϊΠζ ͖ͭͷࢦඪʹͳ͍ͬͯΔɻ › ΫϦοΫ͞Εͳ͔͔ͬͨΒͱ͍ͬͯͦͷจॻ͕ؔͳ͍Θ͚Ͱͳ͍ɻ(จॻ͕ؔͳ ͍ɾϢʔβ͕จॻΛ؍ଌ͍ͯ͠ͳ͍ɾϥϯμϜཁૉʹΑΔͷ)
ଟ͘ͷ؍ଌσʔλʹ͍ͭͯฏۉΛऔΕϊΠζআڈͰ͖Δͱߟ͑ΒΕΔ͕ɺόΠΞεআ ڈͰ͖ͳ͍ɻ 10
ҼՌධՁɿ؍ଌɾΫϦοΫϞσϧ Ϣʔβͷ؍ଌٴͼจॻͷؔ࿈ͷΈΛߟྀʹೖΕΔͱɺϢʔβͷΫϦοΫҎԼͷΑ͏ʹϞ σϦϯάͰ͖ͦ͏ɿ › ϥϯΩϯά R ʹ͓͍ͯจॻ di ͕؍ଌ͞ΕΔ (oi
= 1 Ͱද͢) ֬ɺ P (oi = 1 j R; di) (؍ଌ͞ΕΔ֬ؔ࿈ʹؔͳ͍ͱԾఆ͍ͯ͠Δɻ) › ؔ࿈ y (di) ͱ؍ଌ oi ͕༩͑ΒΕͨ࣌ͷɺจॻ di ͕ΫϦοΫ͞ΕΔ֬ (ci = 1 Ͱද͢) ɺ P (ci = 1 j oi; y (di)) › ΫϦοΫ؍ଌ͞Εͨจॻʹ͔͠ى͜Βͳ͍ͨΊɺϥϯΩϯά R ʹ͓͍ͯΫϦοΫ͞ ΕΔ֬ɿ P (ci = 1 ^ oi = 1 j y (di) ; R) = P (ci = 1 j oi = 1; y (di)) ´ P (oi = 1 j R; di) 11
ҼՌධՁɿ´ (f„; D; y) ͷφΠʔϒਪఆ ´ (f„; D; y) ΛφΠʔϒʹਪఆ͢ΔʹɺΫϦοΫͷใ
(ci) Λਅͷؔ࿈ϥϕϧ (y (di)) ͷΘΓʹ͑Αͯ͘ɺ ´NAIVE (f„; D; c) := X di2D – (rank (di j f„; D)) ´ ci ͱͳΔɻ ΫϦοΫʹϊΠζ͕͍ͬͯͳ͍࣌ɺͭ·Γ P (ci = 1 j oi = 1; y (di)) = y (di) Ͱ͋Δ࣌Ͱ͑͞ɺφΠʔϒਪఆ؍ଌόΠΞεΛड͚͍ͯΔɿ Eo ˆ´NAIVE (f„; D; c)˜ = Eo 2 4 X di2D – (rank (di j f„; D)) ´ ci 3 5 = Eo 2 6 4 X di:oi=1^y(di)=1 – (rank (di j f„; D)) 3 7 5 = X di:y(di)=1 P (oi = 1 j R; di)– (rank (di j f„; D)) = X di2D P (oi = 1 j R; di)– (rank (di j f„; D)) ´ y (di) 12
ҼՌධՁɿ´ (f„; D; y) ͷφΠʔϒਪఆ φΠʔϒਪఆɿ Eo ˆ´NAIVE (f„; D;
c)˜ = X di:y(di)=1 P (oi = 1 j R; di)– (rank (di j f„; D)) ͰɺͦΕͧΕͷจॻͷɺϩάऩू࣌ͷϥϯΩϯά R Ͱͷ؍ଌ֬ͰॏΈͨ͠ਪఆʹͳͬ ͯ͠·͏ɻ ϥϯΩϯάͰɺߴॱҐͷจॻ΄Ͳ؍ଌ͞Ε͍͢ɿ͜ΕΛ position bias ͱݺͿɻϩάऩ ूͷࡍʹߴॱҐʹදࣔ͞Εͨจॻਅͷؔ࿈ΑΓؔ࿈͕͋ΔɺͱόΠΞεΛड͚ͯ͠· ͏ɻ όΠΞεΛআڈ͢ΔͨΊʹɺP (oi = 1 j R; di) Λਪఆ͠ɺิਖ਼ͯ͋͛͠Εྑͦ͞͏ ! είΞʹΑΔόΠΞεআڈ 13
είΞΛ༻͍ͨόΠΞεআڈ Inverse Propensity Scoring(IPS) ʹΑͬͯόΠΞεΛআڈ͢Δɿ ´IPS (f„; D; c) :=
X di2D – (rank (di j f„; D)) P (oi = 1 j R; di) ´ ci ͜͜ͰɺP (oi = 1 j R; di) ϩάऩूதʹදࣔ͞ΕͨϥϯΩϯά R Ͱจॻ di ͕؍ଌ͞ ΕΔ֬Ͱ͋Δɻ´IPS (f„; D; c) ΫϦοΫϊΠζ͕ͳ͍߹ɺͭ·Γ P (ci = 1 j oi = 1; y (di)) = y (di) Ͱ͋Δ࣌ʹ ´ (f„; D; y) ͷෆภਪఆྔͰ͋Δɿ Eo ˆ´IPS (f„; D; c)˜ = Eo 2 4 X di2D – (rank (di j f„; D)) P (oi = 1 j R; di) ´ ci 3 5 = Eo 2 6 4 X di:oi=1^y(di)=1 – (rank (di j f„; D)) P (oi = 1 j R; di) 3 7 5 = X di:y(di)=1 P (oi = 1 j R; di) ´ – (rank (di j f„; D)) P (oi = 1 j R; di) = X di2D – (rank (di j f„; D)) ´ y (di) = ´ (f„; D; y) : 14
Propensity-weighted LTR IPS ´ (f„; D; y) ͷෆภਪఆͰ͋ͬͨɻΑͬͯɺ࠷దͳϞσϧύϥϝʔλ „
IPS Λ ࠷దԽ͢Δ͜ͱͰٻΊΔ͜ͱ͕Ͱ͖ΔɻIPS Λ࠷దԽ͢ΔࡍɺϥϯΩϯάࢦඪ – (r) ͷඍ ෆՄೳੑʹରॲ͢ΔͨΊɺ– (r) ͷ bound Λར༻͢Δɻ Propensity-weighted LTR ͷྲྀΕɿ › ΫϦοΫͷείΞΛਪఆɿ P (oi = 1 j R; di) › ෆภਪఆྔ ´IPS (f„; D; c) ͷ bound ʹ͍ͭͯඍΛܭࢉɿ „0 = r„ "– (rank (di j f„; D)) P (oi = 1 j R; di) # › ϞσϧύϥϝʔλΛߋ৽ „new „old ` „0 15
References › https://ilps.github.io/webconf2020-tutorial-unbiased-ltr/ 16