Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Minimalist turfgrass nutrition

Micah Woods
November 27, 2017

Minimalist turfgrass nutrition

My slides from the 2017 Alberta Property Managers Conference. I explained how the minimum amount of fertilizer to apply, and the maximum amount to apply, are the same, and can be described as the right amount to apply. Then I discussed how to determine the right amount to apply.

Micah Woods

November 27, 2017
Tweet

More Decks by Micah Woods

Other Decks in Education

Transcript

  1. We want to ensure that the grass is supplied with

    all the nutrients it can use. This quantity is the minimum amount to supply.
  2. However, adding more nutrients than the grass can use, or

    than the soil can hold, is a waste. Adding enough to ensure that grass is supplied with all the nutrients it can use is also the maximum amount to supply.
  3. The minimum and the maximum amount to apply are the

    same. I call this the right amount, or just what the grass requires.
  4. “Medium range: approximately a 50% chance of getting a plant

    growth response …; if supplemental fertilizer is not applied, growth will probably be limited, especially as the season progresses.”
  5. “High range: little or no crop response is expected from

    applying the particular nutrient.”
  6. “In some cases, turfgrasses have been placed in a ‘high’

    P and K requirement category, while pasture grasses were in a ‘low’ category. This decision was based on economics, not agronomics. The cost of fertilization was not considered of primary importance for turf.” – Carrow, Waddington, and Rieke
  7. “Turfgrass researchers continue to improve the soil testing recommendations, but

    that type of research is time consuming and expensive. It is also worth noting that every time a researcher conducts one of these studies, they tend to find that the levels required are lower than what we previously thought – meaning that ‘low potassium’ you got on your last soil test report might be optimum down the road.” – Doug Soldat
  8. In the case of no soil testing With no soil

    test, it makes sense to supply 100% of what the grass can use.
  9. When there is a soil test It makes sense to

    supply the amount the grass uses that it can’t get from the soil. That is, the grass use minus the soil test.
  10. More specifically... One can express the quantity of an element

    required as fertilizer as Q. a + b − c = Q where, a is the quantity of the element used by the grass b is the quantity of the element kept in the soil (MLSN) c is the quantity of the element present in the soil Q is the quantity of the element required as fertilizer