Upgrade to Pro — share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …

Liverpool School of Geography and Planning Seminar

Nik Lomax
February 20, 2018

Liverpool School of Geography and Planning Seminar

I present results from the NewEthpop project with a range of scenarios of future population size and composition under different Brexit scenarios.

Nik Lomax

February 20, 2018
Tweet

More Decks by Nik Lomax

Other Decks in Research

Transcript

  1. Seminar delivered at the University of Liverpool
    20 February 2018
    Ethnic population
    projections for post-Brexit
    Britain
    Nik Lomax
    School of Geography
    FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT
    [email protected]

    View Slide

  2. What issues matter most to people?
    Data source: YouGov Political Tracker results (2016, 2017)

    View Slide

  3. Perception vs reality
    Ipsos MORI Perils of Perception survey 2013:
    • What percentage of the United Kingdom
    population do you think are immigrants to this
    country (i.e. not born in the UK)?
    Public
    Perception
    31%

    View Slide

  4. Perception vs reality
    Ipsos MORI Perils of Perception survey 2013:
    • What percentage of the United Kingdom
    population do you think are immigrants to this
    country (i.e. not born in the UK)?
    Public
    Perception
    31%
    Reality
    13%

    View Slide

  5. Perception vs reality
    Ipsos MORI Perils of Perception survey 2013:
    • Out of every 100 people in Britain, about how
    many do you think Are Black or Asian?
    Public
    Perception
    30/100

    View Slide

  6. Perception vs reality
    Ipsos MORI Perils of Perception survey 2013:
    • Out of every 100 people in Britain, about how
    many do you think Are Black or Asian?
    Public
    Perception
    30/100
    Reality
    14/100

    View Slide

  7. Post referendum survey
    Ipsos MORI Perils of Perception survey 2016:
    • Out of every 100 residents in the UK, about
    how many do you think were born in an EU
    member state other than the UK?
    Public
    Perception
    15/100
    Remain = 10
    Leave = 20

    View Slide

  8. Post referendum survey
    Ipsos MORI Perils of Perception survey 2016:
    • Out of every 100 residents in the UK, about
    how many do you think were born in an EU
    member state other than the UK?
    Reality
    5/100
    Public
    Perception
    15/100
    Remain = 10
    Leave = 20

    View Slide

  9. Context: Population trends
    59
    63
    Source: ONS Population of the United Kingdom by Country of Birth and Nationality
    80%
    82%
    84%
    86%
    88%
    90%
    92%
    94%
    96%
    98%
    100%
    56,000
    57,000
    58,000
    59,000
    60,000
    61,000
    62,000
    63,000
    64,000
    65,000
    66,000
    2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
    % of population UK Born
    Population (000s)
    Year
    UK Population % UK Born CI

    View Slide

  10. The impact of assumptions on
    projections

    View Slide

  11. Variant projections
    "high population" variant assumes high fertility,
    life expectancy and net migration:
    4.1 million above principal projection
    "low population" variant assumes low fertility,
    life expectancy and net migration:
    4.9 million below principal projection

    View Slide

  12. Evaluation, Revision and Extension of Ethnic
    Population Projections - ETHPOP
    Our overall aim is to understand and to forecast
    the ethnic composition, size and distribution of
    the United Kingdom’s population
    www.ethpop.org
    The research was supported by ESRC award ES/L013878/1 for the project
    Evaluation, Revision and Extension of Ethnic Population Projections – NewETHPOP

    View Slide

  13. Why Ethnicity?
    • It is well established that demographic rates vary
    substantially by ethnic group: see Coleman
    (2006), Coleman (2010) Rees (2012).
    • Variation in service provision needs, e.g.
    – health care (Parliamentary office of Science and
    Technology 2007)
    – social care (Rees et al. 2009)
    – education (Penn, 2000)
    • Very important for monitoring ethnic advantage /
    disadvantage & segregation.

    View Slide

  14. Why Ethnicity?
    • An ethnically disaggregated projection should
    perform better than one which is only
    disaggregated by age and sex because
    additional ethnic heterogeneity is taken in to
    account within the model.

    View Slide

  15. What impact do
    international and internal
    migration have on the size,
    composition and distribution
    of the UK population by
    ethnicity?
    Method: Run a
    projection model
    which
    experiments with
    migration
    components
    Aim: To prepare us
    for what will be a
    new and different
    demographic
    future
    Key Question

    View Slide

  16. How? A population projection model
    Pro
    Cohort
    component
    model
    Bi-regional
    Single year
    of age
    2 genders
    12
    ethnicities
    389 local
    authority
    areas
    2011 base
    50 year
    horizon
    Ethnic
    mixing

    View Slide

  17. Contribution of migration to
    population change in the UK
    Natural
    change
    Fertility -
    Mortality
    Net
    Migration
    Immigration
    - Emigration

    View Slide

  18. Fertility and Mortality
    0
    20
    40
    60
    80
    100
    120
    140
    160
    <20 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40+
    ASFR, 2001
    White Black-Caribbean Black-African Indian
    Pakistani Bangladeshi Chinese Other

    View Slide

  19. Internal migration
    0
    20
    40
    60
    80
    100
    120
    140
    160
    180
    200
    0to4 5to9 10to14 15to19 20to24 25to29 30to34 35to39 40to44 45to49 50to54 55to59 60to64 65to69 70to74 75+
    BAN
    BLA
    BLC
    CHI
    IND
    MIX
    OAS
    OBL
    OTH
    PAK
    WBI
    WHO
    Rate per 1,000
    Estimated from 2011 Census tables UKMIG003, MU01AUK_LA_All and MMo1_BUK_All

    View Slide

  20. International migration
    Direct impact
    Indirect
    impact

    View Slide

  21. Scenario assumptions
    Scenario International Migration
    No Brexit Net International Migration trended to = +252k in 2031-32,
    then constant. Annually, In = 621k, Out = 362k
    Soft Brexit Net International Migration trended to = +185k in 2031-32,
    then constant. Annually, In = 518k, Out = 333k
    Hard Brexit Net International Migration trended to = +100k in 2031-32,
    then constant. Annually, In = 349k, Out = 249k
    No International
    Migration
    Set to zero – Reference projection
    No Migration Set to zero – Reference projection
    Scenario Internal Migration
    No Brexit, Soft Brexit and
    Hard Brexit, No
    International Migration
    5-year average rates from 2006-07 to 2010-11 period applied
    to population at risk (by age, sex and ethnicity) in each year
    No Migration Set to zero – Reference projection

    View Slide

  22. Scenario assumptions
    No Brexit
    Soft Brexit
    Hard Brexit

    View Slide

  23. Direct Impact of Migration
    Ethnicity No Brexit Soft Brexit Hard Brexit
    Immig. Emig. Balance Immig. Emig. Balance Immig. Emig. Balance
    White British & Irish 6,979 8,633 -1,655 5,924 8,009 -2,085 4,615 5,482 -867
    Other White 11,242 4,052 7,189 9,617 3,764 5,853 7,857 3,701 4,156
    Mixed 884 480 404 761 446 315 599 381 218
    Indian 2,584 835 1,749 2,211 776 1,435 1,397 755 642
    Pakistani 1,188 554 635 1,026 515 511 689 399 290
    Bangladeshi 293 256 37 253 238 16 245 168 76
    Chinese 2,281 855 1,425 1,943 794 1,149 868 402 465
    Other Asian 2,054 870 1,185 1,762 808 954 1,275 668 607
    Black African 1,508 461 1,046 1,290 428 862 1,295 692 603
    Black Caribbean 196 333 -138 169 311 -142 211 177 34
    Other Black 181 129 52 156 120 36 173 113 60
    Other 1,364 463 900 1,163 429 734 849 433 416
    All 30,754 17,922 12,831 26,277 16,638 9,639 20,072 13,370 6,702
    The cumulative immigration, emigration and balance for the period 2011 to 2060

    View Slide

  24. Indirect impact of migration
    No Brexit (business as usual)
    ‘Soft’ Brexit
    No Migration
    Four Migration Scenarios
    ‘Hard’ Brexit
    No International Migration

    View Slide

  25. Populations very reliant on
    international migration
    • Generally largest net
    migration groups
    • Indian – older population
    (34.1)
    • Chinese and Other have
    low fertility (1.26 / 1.77)

    View Slide

  26. Populations very reliant on
    international migration
    • Generally largest net
    migration groups
    • Indian – older population
    (34.1)
    • Chinese and Other have
    low fertility (1.26 / 1.77)

    View Slide

  27. Populations somewhat reliant on
    international migration
    Relatively young – BLA = 27.8 / OBL = 25.8
    Black African have large starting –population and relatively high fertility (2.64)

    View Slide

  28. Populations somewhat reliant on
    international migration
    Relatively young – BLA = 27.8 / OBL = 25.8
    Black African have large starting –population and relatively high fertility (2.64)

    View Slide

  29. Populations which continue to grow
    These groups have the demographic momentum to keep growing
    Very young populations: Pakistani = 27; Bangladeshi = 25.5; Mixed = 21.8 (youngest)
    Pakistani and Bangladeshi have very high fertility: TFR=3.2 and 3.47

    View Slide

  30. Populations which continue to grow
    These groups have the demographic momentum to keep growing
    Very young populations: Pakistani = 27; Bangladeshi = 25.5; Mixed = 21.8 (youngest)
    Pakistani and Bangladeshi have very high fertility: TFR=3.2 and 3.47

    View Slide

  31. Populations which are declining
    anyway
    These are the oldest groups who continue to age (WBI = 41.4; BLC = 38.7)
    They have relatively low fertility (WBI = 1.83; BLC = 1.75)
    They have net out-migration (except BLC under Hard Brexit)

    View Slide

  32. Populations which are declining
    anyway
    These are the oldest groups who continue to age (WBI = 41.4; BLC = 38.7)
    They have relatively low fertility (WBI = 1.83; BLC = 1.75)
    They have net out-migration (except BLC under Hard Brexit)

    View Slide

  33. Composition and diversity
    Ethnicity 2061 Population Scenario (%)
    2011
    Population
    (%)
    No Brexit Soft Brexit Hard Brexit
    No
    International
    Migration
    No Migration
    White British & Irish 82.4 57.9 59.6 64.5 75.6 75.2
    Other White 4.5 12.9 11.8 10.0 4.0 3.9
    Mixed 2.0 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.3 4.4
    Indian 2.4 5.2 5.0 3.8 2.7 2.9
    Pakistani 1.9 5.1 5.1 4.9 4.6 4.6
    Bangladeshi 0.7 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.8
    Chinese 0.7 2.6 2.4 1.4 0.6 0.6
    Other Asian 1.4 3.1 3.0 2.5 1.6 1.7
    Black African 1.7 3.7 3.7 3.5 2.5 2.7
    Black Caribbean 0.9 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.9
    Other Black 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6
    Other 0.9 1.8 1.7 1.4 0.8 0.8
    Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
    Total Pop. 63,743 86,902 82,883 78,087 65,659 66,742
    Diversity 0.32 0.64 0.62 0.57 0.42 0.43
    Index of Diversity = 1 - S
    e
    re
    2 where re
    = proportion of the population in ethnic group e

    View Slide

  34. Sub-national changes (Soft Brexit)

    View Slide

  35. Sub-national changes (Soft Brexit)
    Index of Diversity = 1 - S
    e
    r
    e
    2 where r
    e
    = proportion of the population in ethnic group e

    View Slide

  36. Population ageing
    Eth Year Scenario % 0-19 % 20-69 % 70+ PSR Eth Year Scenario % 0-19 % 20-69 % 70+ PSR
    WBI 2011 Base pop 22.4 64.3 13.3 4.8 CHI 2011 Base pop 20.1 76.5 3.3 22.8
    2061 No Brexit 22.9 53.7 23.3 2.2 2061 No Brexit 14.9 75.7 9.4 7.1
    2061 Soft Brexit 22.7 53.7 23.6 2.2 2061 Soft Brexit 14.7 74.2 11 6.7
    2061 Hard Brexit 20.8 55.4 23.8 2.2 2061 Hard Brexit 7.8 36.5 55.7 3.0
    WHO 2011 Base pop 18.6 77 4.3 17.7 OAS 2011 Base pop 28.2 69.1 2.7 25.2
    2061 No Brexit 12.8 72.2 15 4.5 2061 No Brexit 21.5 62.3 16.3 3.6
    2061 Soft Brexit 12.7 70.5 16.8 4.0 2061 Soft Brexit 21.5 60.8 17.7 3.4
    2061 Hard Brexit 10.7 42.7 46.6 3.2 2061 Hard Brexit 19 48.3 32.7 2.7
    MIX 2011 Base pop 53.4 44.6 1.9 23.1 BLA 2011 Base pop 36.5 62.1 1.4 42.8
    2061 No Brexit 35.5 56.7 7.7 7.0 2061 No Brexit 27.2 55.7 17.1 3.2
    2061 Soft Brexit 34.8 57.1 8.1 6.9 2061 Soft Brexit 27.2 54.7 18.1 3.3
    2061 Hard Brexit 28.7 59.6 11.7 6.4 2061 Hard Brexit 24.8 48.2 27 3.0
    IND 2011 Base pop 24 70.6 5.4 13 BLC 2011 Base pop 22.8 66.7 10.5 6.4
    2061 No Brexit 24.2 60.9 14.9 3.9 2061 No Brexit 25.1 43.8 31 1.4
    2061 Soft Brexit 24.2 59.6 16.2 3.6 2061 Soft Brexit 24.7 43.7 31.7 1.5
    2061 Hard Brexit 22 47.7 30.4 2.6 2061 Hard Brexit 19.7 50.8 29.5 1.9
    PAK 2011 Base pop 39.3 57.5 3.1 18.3 BLO 2011 Base pop 44.7 53.2 2.1 25
    2061 No Brexit 38.2 52.6 9.2 5.5 2061 No Brexit 25 59.1 15.9 3.6
    2061 Soft Brexit 38.3 52.1 9.5 5.3 2061 Soft Brexit 24.6 58.8 16.6 3.6
    2061 Hard Brexit 37.8 49.8 12.4 4.8 2061 Hard Brexit 19.6 59.1 21.3 3.6
    BAN 2011 Base pop 41.5 55.9 2.7 21 OTH 2011 Base pop 29.4 67.7 2.9 23.2
    2061 No Brexit 38 48.5 13.5 3.5 2061 No Brexit 14.1 66.4 19.5 3.2
    2061 Soft Brexit 38 48.1 13.8 4.4 2061 Soft Brexit 13.8 64.7 21.5 3.0
    2061 Hard Brexit 36.2 47.5 16.3 4.4 2061 Hard Brexit 9.6 46.4 44 2.3
    PSR calculated by dividing the percentage of population aged 20-69 by the percentage of population aged 70+

    View Slide

  37. Population Support Ratios (70+)
    PSR calculated by dividing the percentage of population aged 20-69 by the percentage of population aged 70+

    View Slide

  38. Key message
    Ethnic
    groups
    affected
    differently
    by Brexit,
    but…

    View Slide

  39. Key message
    The population
    will be more
    diverse
    The population
    is ageing
    Ethnic
    groups
    affected
    differently
    by Brexit,
    but…
    … under all
    scenarios

    View Slide

  40. The latest ONS statistics*
    (to mid 2017) suggest:
    • A downturn in EU immigration, which is built
    into the Soft and Hard Brexit scenarios.
    • There was also a steep upturn in emigration,
    which we had not anticipated.
    • EU citizens are voting with their feet: they are
    not coming to work in the UK in as large
    numbers and are leaving to work elsewhere in
    larger numbers.
    *ONS (2017). Migration Statistics Quarterly Report: November 2017.

    View Slide

  41. Down-scaling projections

    View Slide

  42. ‘Down-scaling’
    Pregnolato et al. A
    building stock and
    household composition
    model for the UK.
    GISRUK 2018.

    View Slide

  43. Microsimulation approach
    Lomax, N. and Smith, A P. (2017) Microsimulation for demography. Australian Population Studies, 1(1): 73-85
    • A simpler ‘static sequential’ projection and a more
    complex dynamic model
    • Still retains the ethnic dimension of projection

    View Slide

  44. Seminar delivered at the University of Liverpool
    20 February 2018
    Ethnic population
    projections for post-Brexit
    Britain
    Nik Lomax
    School of Geography
    FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT
    [email protected]

    View Slide