Upgrade to Pro
— share decks privately, control downloads, hide ads and more …
Speaker Deck
Features
Speaker Deck
PRO
Sign in
Sign up for free
Search
Search
外国語教育(研究)における量的データの視覚化と解釈
Search
Sponsored
·
Your Podcast. Everywhere. Effortlessly.
Share. Educate. Inspire. Entertain. You do you. We'll handle the rest.
→
Ken Urano
August 06, 2019
Education
1k
0
Share
Embed
Copy iframe code
Copy JS code
Copy link
Start on current slide
外国語教育(研究)における量的データの視覚化と解釈
FLEAT VII (LET2019) ワークショップ
2019/08/06
@早稲田大学
Ken Urano
August 06, 2019
More Decks by Ken Urano
See All by Ken Urano
AI-Based Speaking Assessment of a Short-Term Study Abroad Program
uranoken
0
230
Estimating Group × Time Interaction in Scale-Transformed CEFR-J Self-Assessment Scores: A Case in Study-Abroad Research
uranoken
0
84
Investigating Changes in Self-Assessed Spoken English Proficiency in a Three-Week Study-Abroad Program
uranoken
0
200
The Task is not the End: The Role of Task Repetition and Sequencing In Language Teaching
uranoken
0
750
学習者を対象にした英語教育研究における倫理的配慮
uranoken
0
1.2k
学習者データを「見る」:外国語教師のためのデータの入力、分析、解釈方法
uranoken
0
1.3k
英語教育研究でエビデンスを「つくる」:メタ分析、再現性、追試
uranoken
0
1.6k
タスク·ベースの英語授業:基本的な考え方とデザイン方法
uranoken
0
1.3k
英語の授業をタスクで組み立てる
uranoken
0
1.4k
Other Decks in Education
See All in Education
[2026前期火5] 論理学(京都大学文学部 前期 第8回)「正規化定理の証明」
yatabe
0
140
アラムコSTEAMチャレンジ 実践報告書
codeforeveryone
0
140
【セーフィー】テクニカルライティング&コミュニケーション実践講座(26新卒エンジニア向け研修資料)
ymzaki_m4
0
210
SARA Annual Report 2025-26
sara2023
1
360
偶然のチャンスを掴みに行けるのは君だ!
kotomin_m
2
120
Visionary Initiative: Future Intelligence 「未来の知性と社会の礎を築く」|Science Tokyo(東京科学大学)
sciencetokyo
PRO
0
280
「機械学習と因果推論」入門 ③ 漸近効率な推定量と二重機械学習
masakat0
0
670
From Days to Minutes: How We Taught an AI to Onboard 50+ Tenants on our AI Features
mfcabrera
0
170
生成AI時代のエンジニア育成について考えてみた
akasan
0
140
Visionary Initiative: Materials-Positive Society 「モノの進化をポジティブな社会の原動力に」|Science Tokyo(東京科学大学)
sciencetokyo
PRO
0
360
!コスパよくインターンに受かる方法!
ruribou
0
260
生成AIを授業の相棒にするデータサイエンス入門(「デジタル✕探究」イノベーターズフォーラム テクニカルセッション講演資料)
datascientistsociety
PRO
0
290
Featured
See All Featured
svc-hook: hooking system calls on ARM64 by binary rewriting
retrage
2
290
Reality Check: Gamification 10 Years Later
codingconduct
0
2.2k
How to Ace a Technical Interview
jacobian
281
24k
State of Search Keynote: SEO is Dead Long Live SEO
ryanjones
0
200
How to make the Groovebox
asonas
2
2.2k
Winning Ecommerce Organic Search in an AI Era - #searchnstuff2025
aleyda
1
2k
Effective software design: The role of men in debugging patriarchy in IT @ Voxxed Days AMS
baasie
0
400
The Curse of the Amulet
leimatthew05
1
13k
[RailsConf 2023 Opening Keynote] The Magic of Rails
eileencodes
31
10k
Optimizing for Happiness
mojombo
378
71k
The State of eCommerce SEO: How to Win in Today's Products SERPs - #SEOweek
aleyda
2
11k
A brief & incomplete history of UX Design for the World Wide Web: 1989–2019
jct
2
390
Transcript
֎ࠃޠڭҭʢݚڀʣʹ͓͚Δ ྔతσʔλͷࢹ֮Խͱղऍ Ӝ ݚʢւֶԂେֶʣ email:
[email protected]
FLEAT VII / LET2019
@ Waseda University ɹɹ2019. 8. 6. https://www.urano-ken.com/research/let2019
ຊͷࢿྉ
֎ࠃޠڭҭʹܞΘΔࢲͨͪɺݚڀʹ͓͍͚ͯͩͰͳ ͘ɺςετॲཧͱ͍ͬͨ໘Ͱ͝Ζ͔ΒྔԽ ͞ΕͨσʔλΛѻ͍ͬͯ·͢ɻຊϫʔΫγϣοϓͰɺ ڭҭݚڀͰྔతσʔλΛѻ͏ࡍʹ·ͣߦ͏͖σʔλ ͷࢹ֮ԽͱɺσʔλͷಛΛཧղ͢ΔͨΊͷجຊతͳ֓ ೦ͱͯ͠ͷදɾɾޮՌྔͷҙຯʹֶ͍ͭͯͼɺ ϑϦʔͰΦʔϓϯιʔεͷ౷ܭιϑτ jamovi Λͬͯɺ ࣮ࡍʹσʔλͷ؆୯ͳੳ͕Ͱ͖ΔΑ͏ʹͳΔ͜ͱΛ
ࢦ͠·͢ɻ ཁࢫ
ՍۭͷσʔλΛ ༻ҙ͠·ͨ͠
Name* Test A খ ರ 70 Տ େޒ 38 খਿ
Ꮺ 58 ௶Ҫ ج༞ 48 ӬҪ ج༞ 28 ڮޱ ๏࢚ 54 ݪ ཽ 58 ༎ 38 ౻ా ࢰಐ 42 ຊؒ խ 47 ٶ࡚ ৎ༤ 78 ଜҪ 68 ࢁ࡚ ଠ 40 ԣҪ ޛࢤ 50 ґా ༸հ 68 एࢁ ప 57 ༗അ Ղ೫ 64 ઘ ګࢠ 76 ؠҪ ඒՂ 43 ߐ ༝Ӊ 90 ਆ୩ ࣿق 58 ઍՂࢠ 38 ࡔా Ѫࡊ 38 ਿా ඒՂ 43 ⁋ຊ ᜫ 58 ୩ ே߳ 60 Ӭ ͘ΔΈ 48 দ ಹಸ 45 ଜҪ ݁ࢠ 24 ए௬ ·Έ 36 *ʮͳΜͪΌͬͯݸਓใʯͰੜ http://kazina.com/dummy/
Group A Test A খ ರ 70 Տ େޒ 38
খਿ Ꮺ 58 ௶Ҫ ج༞ 48 ӬҪ ج༞ 28 ڮޱ ๏࢚ 54 ݪ ཽ 58 ༎ 38 ౻ా ࢰಐ 42 ຊؒ խ 47 ٶ࡚ ৎ༤ 78 ଜҪ 68 ࢁ࡚ ଠ 40 ԣҪ ޛࢤ 50 ґా ༸հ 68 एࢁ ప 57 ༗അ Ղ೫ 64 ઘ ګࢠ 76 ؠҪ ඒՂ 43 ߐ ༝Ӊ 90 ਆ୩ ࣿق 58 ઍՂࢠ 38 ࡔా Ѫࡊ 38 ਿా ඒՂ 43 ⁋ຊ ᜫ 58 ୩ ே߳ 60 Ӭ ͘ΔΈ 48 দ ಹಸ 45 ଜҪ ݁ࢠ 24 ए௬ ·Έ 36 Group B Test A ؠӬ 52 ২ ҭೋ 59 ย ཽ 61 ࡔݩ ᠳଠ 76 ౡଜ ༏ 45 ా ར 68 ࢙ 63 দҪ Ұಙ 69 ࡾݪ ༟࣍ 43 क ཽ࣍ 51 ੨ Έ͋ 36 ୩ ༏ 51 ؠ୩ ౧ࢠ 39 ্ݪ ܠࢠ 71 ߐޱ Ί͙Έ 26 ٴ ͳͭΈ 79 େ௩ ·͞Έ 55 Ԭ ࿏ࢠ 61 ֯ా ౧ࢠ 89 ݁ҥ 51 ਆށ ࡊʑඒ 71 ֎ࢁ Έ͋ 63 রҪ Έ͖ 41 ࠜ؛ ༏ 41 ࠜ؛ ྱࢠ 83 Ӌా ѥر 93 ࢜ ΈΏ͖ 47 ࢪ ༑߳ 37 ଜా จੈ 52 ٢Ӭ ܙས߳ 41
Group A Test A খ ರ 70 Տ େޒ 38
খਿ Ꮺ 58 ௶Ҫ ج༞ 48 ӬҪ ج༞ 28 ڮޱ ๏࢚ 54 ݪ ཽ 58 ༎ 38 ౻ా ࢰಐ 42 ຊؒ խ 47 ٶ࡚ ৎ༤ 78 ଜҪ 68 ࢁ࡚ ଠ 40 ԣҪ ޛࢤ 50 ґా ༸հ 68 एࢁ ప 57 ༗അ Ղ೫ 64 ઘ ګࢠ 76 ؠҪ ඒՂ 43 ߐ ༝Ӊ 90 ਆ୩ ࣿق 58 ઍՂࢠ 38 ࡔా Ѫࡊ 38 ਿా ඒՂ 43 ⁋ຊ ᜫ 58 ୩ ே߳ 60 Ӭ ͘ΔΈ 48 দ ಹಸ 45 ଜҪ ݁ࢠ 24 ए௬ ·Έ 36 Group B Test A ؠӬ 52 ২ ҭೋ 59 ย ཽ 61 ࡔݩ ᠳଠ 76 ౡଜ ༏ 45 ా ར 68 ࢙ 63 দҪ Ұಙ 69 ࡾݪ ༟࣍ 43 क ཽ࣍ 51 ੨ Έ͋ 36 ୩ ༏ 51 ؠ୩ ౧ࢠ 39 ্ݪ ܠࢠ 71 ߐޱ Ί͙Έ 26 ٴ ͳͭΈ 79 େ௩ ·͞Έ 55 Ԭ ࿏ࢠ 61 ֯ా ౧ࢠ 89 ݁ҥ 51 ਆށ ࡊʑඒ 71 ֎ࢁ Έ͋ 63 রҪ Έ͖ 41 ࠜ؛ ༏ 41 ࠜ؛ ྱࢠ 83 Ӌా ѥر 93 ࢜ ΈΏ͖ 47 ࢪ ༑߳ 37 ଜా จੈ 52 ٢Ӭ ܙས߳ 41 ൺͯΈΑ͏ How?
ᶃ ਤʹͯ͠ΈΑ͏
ώετάϥϜ (Histogram) B A 20 40 60 80 100 Score
Group
๘܈ਤ (Beeswarm) 20 40 60 80 A B Group Score
ശͻ͛ਤ (Box Plot) 20 40 60 80 A B Group
Score
ϰΝΠΦϦϯਤ (Violin Plot) 20 40 60 80 A B Group
Score
֬ີ (Density) B A 30 60 90 Score Group
֬ີ (Density) B A 30 60 90 Score Group
ਤʹͯ͠ΈΑ͏ • ऩूͨ͠σʔλʹͲͷΑ͏ͳಛ͕͋Δ͔ɺ ͬ͘͟ΓѲ͢Δ͜ͱ͕Ͱ͖Δɻ • ͰݟΔ͚ͩͳͷͰɺݫີͳൺֱੳʹ ద͞ͳ͍ɻ
ᶄ ཁͯ͠ΈΑ͏
σʔλͷத৺ͱ Β͖ͭ σʔλͷத৺
ฏۉ ͯ͢ͷσʔλͷ߹ܭΛσʔλͷݸͰ ׂͬͨͷ தԝ ͯ͢ͷσʔλΛখ͍͞ॱʢ·ͨେ͖͍ ॱʣʹฒͨͱ͖ɺਅΜதʹདྷΔ ࠷ස ͯ͢ͷσʔλͷதͰग़ݱճ͕࠷ଟ͍ σʔλͷத৺
Group A Group B ฏۉ 52.1 57.1 தԝ 49.0 53.5
࠷ස 38, 58 41, 51 σʔλͷத৺
ඪ४ภࠩ σʔλͷΒ͖ͭ
• ݸʑͷͱฏۉͱͷࠩΛ̎͠ɺ ͦͷ߹ܭΛσʔλͷͰׂͬͨͷͷฏํࠜ Group A Test A খ ರ 70
Տ େޒ 38 খਿ Ꮺ 58 ௶Ҫ ج༞ 48 ӬҪ ج༞ 28 ڮޱ ๏࢚ 54 ݪ ཽ 58 ༎ 38 ౻ా ࢰಐ 42 (70–52.1)2 = 320.4 (38–52.1)2 = 198.8 (58–52.1)2 = 034.8 . . . ߹ܭ 6828.7 / 30 = 227.6 √ 227.6 = 15.1 Group A ฏۉ 52.1 ←ʢࢄʣ ඪ४ภࠩ
• ݸʑͷͱฏۉͱͷࠩΛ̎͠ɺ ͦͷ߹ܭΛσʔλͷͰׂͬͨͷͷฏํࠜ Group A Test A খ ರ 70
Տ େޒ 38 খਿ Ꮺ 58 ௶Ҫ ج༞ 48 ӬҪ ج༞ 28 ڮޱ ๏࢚ 54 ݪ ཽ 58 ༎ 38 ౻ా ࢰಐ 42 (70–52.1)2 = 320.4 (38–52.1)2 = 198.8 (58–52.1)2 = 034.8 . . . ߹ܭ 6828.7 / 30 = 227.6 √ 227.6 = 15.1 Group A ฏۉ 52.1 ඪ४ภࠩ 15.1 ←ʢࢄʣ ඪ४ภࠩ
0 20 40 60 80 100 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03
0.04 0 20 40 60 80 100 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 ฏۉ = 50 ͷ߹ ඪ४ภࠩ = 10 ඪ४ภࠩ = 20 34.1% 13.6% 34.1% 34.1% 13.6% 34.1% 13.6% 13.6% ඪ४ภࠩ
0 20 40 60 80 100 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03
0.04 0 20 40 60 80 100 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 ฏۉ = 50 ͷ߹ ඪ४ภࠩ = 10 ඪ४ภࠩ = 20 ඪ४ภࠩ
ʢ٢ా, 1998, p. 173ʣ ඪ४ภࠩ
ʢ٢ా, 1998, p. 173ʣ ࠩಉ͡ ඪ४ภࠩ
ॏͳΓͷྔ͕ҧ͏ ඪ४ภࠩ
Group A Group B ฏۉ 52.1 57.1 ඪ४ภࠩ 15.1 16.4
Group A Group B 0 20 40 60 80 100
0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030 0 20 40 60 80 100 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030
Group A Group B 0 20 40 60 80 100
0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030 0 20 40 60 80 100 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030
ฏۉͷࠩ Group A Group B Group A Group B ฏۉ
52.1 57.1 ඪ४ภࠩ 15.1 16.4 0 20 40 60 80 100 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030 0 20 40 60 80 100 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030 ͷҧ͍
ݴ͑ͦ͏ͳ͜ͱ • ฏۉͷൺֱ͚ͩͰෆे • σʔλͷʢΒ͖ͭʣ߹Θͤͯݕ౼ • ͷॏͳΓ͕গͳ͍ํ͕͕ࠩେ͖͍
͏ҰൺͯΈΑ͏ Group A Group B 0 20 40 60 80
100 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030 0 20 40 60 80 100 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030
͏ҰൺͯΈΑ͏ 0" 1" 2" 3" 4" 5" 6" 7" 8"
9" 0,10" 11,20" 21,30" 31,40" 41,50" 51,60" 61,70" 71,80" 81,90" 91,100" Group"A" Group"B" ࣮ࡍͷΛϓϩοτͨ͠ͷ
͏ҰൺͯΈΑ͏ 0" 1" 2" 3" 4" 5" 6" 7" 8"
9" 0,10" 11,20" 21,30" 31,40" 41,50" 51,60" 61,70" 71,80" 81,90" 91,100" Group"A" Group"B" ͜ͷॏͳΓେ͖͍ͷʁখ͍͞ͷʁ
ࢦඪ͕΄͍͠
ޮՌྔʢEffect Sizeʣ • ޮՌͷେ͖͞Λ͋ΒΘ͢౷ܭతͳࢦඪ ʢେٱอɾԬా, 2012, p. 44ʣ
ޮՌྔͷछྨ
• ࠩͷେ͖͞Λද͢ࢦඪʢd ʣ • ؔͷڧ͞Λද͢ࢦඪʢr ʣ େ͖͚ͯ̎ͭ͘
ࠩͷେ͖͞Λද͢ࢦඪ Cohen’s d
pooled SD X X d 2 1 − = ←ɹฏۉͷࠩ
←ɹඪ४ภࠩ Cohen’s d ʮ̎ͭͷάϧʔϓͷࠩඪ४ภࠩԿݸʯ
pooled SD X X d 2 1 − = |
52.1 - 57.1| = (15.1 + 16.4) / 2* *ඪຊαΠζ͕ҟͳΔͱ͖ɺSDpooled ͷܭࢉ͏গ͠ෳࡶʹͳΓ·͢ Group A Group B ฏۉ 52.1 57.1 ඪ४ภࠩ 15.1 16.4 Cohen’s d
pooled SD X X d 2 1 − = 5.0
= 15.75 *ඪຊαΠζ͕ҟͳΔͱ͖ɺSDpooled ͷܭࢉ͏গ͠ෳࡶʹͳΓ·͢ Group A Group B ฏۉ 52.1 57.1 ඪ४ภࠩ 15.1 16.4 = 0.32 Cohen’s d
d 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 ॏͳΓ ʢˋʣ
100 92.3 85.7 78.7 72.6 67 61.8 d 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 ॏͳΓ ʢˋʣ 57 52.6 48.4 44.6 41.1 37.8 34.7 ޮՌྔ d ͱͷॏͳΓ
0" 1" 2" 3" 4" 5" 6" 7" 8" 9"
0,10" 11,20" 21,30" 31,40" 41,50" 51,60" 61,70" 71,80" 81,90" 91,100" Group"A" Group"B" d = 0.32 ͳͷͰॏͳΓ 3/4 ͙Β͍ ࠶ͼ͜ͷάϥϑ
ͭ·Γ
Group A ͱ Group B ɺ ฏۉʹ 5 ͕ࠩ͋Δ͕ɺ શମͷ
3/4 ॏͳ͍ͬͯΔɻ
ޮՌྔ d ͱॏͳΓͷؔ
pooled SD X X d 2 1 − = ←ɹখ͍͞ํ͕ྑ͍
←ɹେ͖͍ํ͕ྑ͍ d ͕େ͖͘ͳΔʹ ʮฏۉͷ͕ࠩେ͖͘ɺඪ४ภ͕ࠩখ͘͞ͳΔ ͱɺޮՌྔେ͖͘ͳΔɻʯ
• Cohen (1988) • small: d = 0.2, overlap: 85.7%
• e.g., 15ࡀͱ16ࡀͷঁࢠͷࠩ • medium: d = 0.5, overlap: 67.0% • e.g., 14ࡀͱ18ࡀͷঁࢠͷࠩ • large: d = 0.8, overlap: 52.6% • e.g., େֶ৽ೖੜͱPhDऔಘऀͷIQࠩ ޮՌྔͷղऍ
• Plonsky & Oswald (2014) • “L2 field-specific benchmarks” ܈ؒൺֱ
܈ൺֱ small d = 0.40 d = 0.60 medium d = 0.70 d = 1.00 large d = 1.00 d = 1.40 ޮՌྔͷղऍ
ͨͩ͠
• ͜ͷΑ͏ͳࢦඪ͋͘·Ͱ҆ • ࣮ࡍͷղऍݚڀऀࣗͷͰ
༗ҙੑݕఆ ॏͳΓͷେ͖͞Θ͔͚ͬͨͲɺ ͜ͷࠩۮવʁ
؍͞Ε͕ͨࠩۮવੜͨ͡ͷͰ͋Δ Մೳੑʢ֬ʣ ༗ҙੑݕఆ
ʮʢ౷ܭతʣ༗ҙੑʯͱ • ͷલͷσʔλʢඪຊʣ͔ΒΑΓେ͖ͳจ຺ ʢूஂʣΛਪఆ͢Δ • ඪຊͰ؍͞ΕΔࠩɾ͕ؔɺूஂ͔Βͷ ඪຊநग़࣌ͷޡࠩͰੜ͡Δ֬ʢp ʣΛ ܭࢉ͢Δ •
p ͕ج४ʢྟքʣҎԼͰ͋Εʮ༗ҙʯ Ͱ͋ΔʢޡࠩͰͳ͍ʣͱஅ͢Δ
ूஂ ඪɹຊ ਪఆ σʔλղੳ Σ, F, t, p... ूஂͱඪຊ
• ͋ΔඪຊͰಘΒΕͨදʢe.g., ฏۉʣ ͱूஂͷදͱͷࠩ ඪຊޡࠩ
ूஂ μ = 15.3 ඪຊA M = 14.7 ඪຊB M
= 15.9 ඪຊC M = 15.2 ඪຊD M = 15.4 ඪຊE M = 15.1
ूஂ μ = 14.7 ඪຊA M = 14.7 ࣮ࡍ M
= μ ͱͯ͠ਪఆ
• ඪຊͷαΠζ͕େ͖͚Εେ͖͍΄Ͳɺ ඪຊޡࠩখ͘͞ͳΔ • ͭ·Γਪఆͷਫ਼͕ߴ͘ͳΔ ඪຊޡࠩ
t ݕఆ ← ฏۉͷࠩ ← ඪ४ภࠩ2ͷ 1 2 2 2
1 2 1 − + − = n SD SD X X t ↑ ʢ֤܈ͷඪຊαΠζʣ ʢඪຊαΠζ͕͍͠߹ʣ ʢ٢ా, 1998, p. 186ʣ
͜Ε͖ͬ͞ݟͨʁ
pooled SD X X d 2 1 − = ←ɹฏۉͷࠩ
←ɹඪ४ภࠩ Cohen’s d ʮ͜Εʹ n Λ͢ͱ t ͬΆ͍ʂʯ
pooled SD X X d 2 1 − = 1
2 2 2 1 2 1 − + − = n SD SD X X t ʮt ɺޮՌྔʹඪຊαΠζΛՃຯͨ͠ͷʯ
←ɹখ͍͞ํ͕ྑ͍ ←ɹେ͖͍ํ͕ྑ͍ t ͕େ͖͘ͳΔʹ 1 2 2 2 1 2
1 − + − = n SD SD X X t ↑ɹେ͖͍ํ͕ྑ͍
ࣗ༝** 3 4 5 10 20 30 ྟք ྆ଆݕఆ5% 3.182
2.776 2.571 2.228 2.086 2.042 ࣗ༝ 40 50 100 200 500 1,000 ྟք ྆ଆݕఆ5% 2.021 2.009 1.984 1.972 1.965 1.962 *͜ΕΑΓେ͖͍ͩͬͨΒۮવͰͳ͍ͱΈͳ͢ **n1 +n2 -2 t ͷྟք*
1 2 2 2 1 2 1 − + −
= n SD SD X X t *2܈Ͱ n ͕ҟͳΔͱ͖ͷܭࢉ ͏গ͠ෳࡶʹͳΓ·͢ * | 52.1-57.1| = √(15.12 + 16.42) / (30 - 1) ܭࢉͯ͠ΈΑ͏ Group A Group B ฏۉ 52.1 57.1 ඪ४ภࠩ 15.1 16.4
1 2 2 2 1 2 1 − + −
= n SD SD X X t * 5 = 4.14 ܭࢉͯ͠ΈΑ͏ = 1.21 Group A Group B ฏۉ 52.1 57.1 ඪ४ภࠩ 15.1 16.4 *2܈Ͱ n ͕ҟͳΔͱ͖ͷܭࢉ ͏গ͠ෳࡶʹͳΓ·͢
ࣗ༝** 3 4 5 10 20 30 ྟք ྆ଆݕఆ5% 3.182
2.776 2.571 2.228 2.086 2.042 ࣗ༝ 40 50 100 200 500 1,000 ྟք ྆ଆݕఆ5% 2.021 2.009 1.984 1.972 1.965 1.962 t ͷྟք t (58) = 1.21 ༗ҙͰͳ͍
͜͜·Ͱͷ·ͱΊ
• ޮՌྔ Cohen’s d • 2ͭͷάϧʔϓؒͷࠩΛඪ४Խͨ͠ͷ • t ݕఆ •
ޮՌྔʹඪຊޡࠩͷӨڹΛՃຯͯ͠ɺͦͷ͕ࠩ ۮવ؍͞ΕΔ֬Λࣔͨ͠ͷ • ݕఆ౷ܭྔ = ޮՌͷେ͖͞ x ඪຊͷେ͖͞ ʢೆ෩ݪ, 2002, p. 163ʣ
• Cohen’s d ͷؒ: • Hedges’ g • ʹूஂͷඪ४ภࠩʢෆภࢄʹ جͮ͘ඪ४ภࠩʣΛ͏
• Glass’ ⊿ • ʹ౷੍܈ͷඪ४ภࠩΛ͏
ؔͷڧ͞Λද͢ࢦඪ Pearson’s r / r2
• มؒͷؔͷେ͖͞Λද͢ • ࠷େ: 1.0ʢઈରʣ • ࠷খ: 0 • ϐΞιϯͷੵ૬ؔ
r • r2 ʢࢄઆ໌ʣ Pearson’s r / r2
ࢄੳͷ߹ ௐ͍ͨཁҼͷࢄ η2 = ૯ࢄ SSA = SSTotal
ҰཁҼࢄੳ SS df MS F p η2 A (Class)
848 2 424 0.955 .389 .022 Error (Residuals) 37260 84 444 ɾਫຊ (2014) ୈ6ষͷσʔλΛͬͯ jamovi Ͱܭࢉ
ҰཁҼࢄੳ SS df MS F p η2 A (Class)
848 2 424 0.955 .389 .022 Error (Residuals) 37260 84 444 / = / = MS = SS / df
ҰཁҼࢄੳ SS df MS F p η2 A (Class)
848 2 424 0.955 .389 .022 Error (Residuals) 37260 84 444 / = ↑ɹඪຊαΠζ͕େ͖͍ͱ F ͕େ͖͘ͳΔ F = MSA / MSError = 424 / 444 = 0.955
ҰཁҼࢄੳ SS df MS F p η2 A (Class)
848 2 424 0.955 .389 .022 Error (Residuals) 37260 84 444 + η2 = SSA / SSTotal = 848 / 38108 = .022 SSTotal = SSA + SSError = 848 + 37260 = 38108
ޮՌྔͷղऍ
• small: η2 = .01 • medium: η2 = .06
• large: η2 = .14 ਫຊɾ (2008) • ͜ͷΑ͏ͳࢦඪ͋͘·Ͱ҆ • ࣮ࡍͷղऍݚڀऀࣗͷͰ
͜͜·Ͱͷ·ͱΊ
• r ͷޮՌྔ • มؒͷؔͷڧ͞ΛͰࣔͨ͠ͷ • ࠷େͰ 1.0ɺ࠷খͰ 0 •
ࢄੳͰ͏ η2 r2 ͱࣅͨײ͡ • F ͱ η2 ͷҧ͍ඪຊαΠζΛߟྀ͢Δ͔Ͳ͏͔ • ݕఆ౷ܭྔ = ޮՌͷେ͖͞ x ඪຊͷେ͖͞ ʢೆ෩ݪ, 2002, p. 163ʣ
• η2 ͷؒ: • partial η2 • ʹ SSA +
SSError Λ͏ • ω2 • ࢄਪఆͷͨΊͷόΠΞεΛऔΓআ ͍ͨͷ
࣮ࡍʹ ܭࢉͯ͠Έ·͠ΐ͏
• Φʔϓϯιʔεͷ౷ܭϓϩάϥϛϯάݴޠ ɹɹΛ͍͍͢ܗʹͨ͠ιϑτΣΞɻ • GUIͷͨΊײతʹ͑Δɻ • ΦʔϓϯιʔεͰແྉͰ͑Δɻ
https://www.jamovi.org
ϋϯζΦϯ
• Must-read: • Navarro, D. J., & Foxcroft, D. R.
(2019). Learning statistics with jamovi: A tutorial for psychology students and other beginners. (Version 0.70). DOI: 10.24384/hgc3-7p15 • ຊޠ༁͋Γ·͢: • ࣳా࢘༁. jamoviͰֶͿ৺ཧ౷ܭ. https://bookdown.org/sbtseiji/lswjamoviJ/
ҙ
None
• ϑΝΠϧಡΈࠐΈ࣌ʹࣗಈత ʹஅ͞ΕΔมͷछྨ͕ؒ ҧ͍ͬͯΔ͜ͱ͕͋Δɻ • Continuous ࿈ଓม • Ordinal ॱংม
• Nominal ໊ٛม
http://www.langtest.jp Effect Size Calculator @
• σʔλੳ͕ͳΜͰ Ͱ͖ͪΌ͏ͷ͍͢͝ ΣϒΞϓϦ • ޮՌྔ d, g ͱͦͷ৴པ۠ ؒΛܭࢉͯ͘͠ΕΔ
• ਫຊಞ͞Μʢؔେֶʣ ͕։ൃ͠ɺແྉͰެ։ • ͓ྱϏʔϧ·ͨ നϫΠϯͰ
None
None
. ਪଌ౷ܭʢ༗ҙੑݕఆʣͰ͏ ඪ४ภࠩʢSDʣෆภࢄʹجͮ͘ ͷɻn ͷΘΓʹ n–1 Λܭࢉʹ ͍·͢ɻ
None
ࢀߟจݙ • ӳޠڭࢣͷͨΊͷڭҭσʔλ ੳೖ • ༗ҙੑݕఆͷ͘͠Έͦͷݶ քʹ͍ͭͯղઆ
ࢀߟจݙ • ຊʹΘ͔Γ͍͘͢͢͝େ ͳ͜ͱ͕ॻ͍ͯΔ͘͝ॳา ͷ౷ܭͷຊ • େͳ͜ͱΛࣜΛަ͑ͯஸ ೡʹղઆ
ࢀߟจݙ • ֎ࠃޠڭҭݚڀϋϯυϒοΫ • هड़౷ܭɺਪଌ౷ܭɺޮՌྔ ؚΊͯཏతͳҰ
ࢀߟจݙ • ͑ΔͨΊͷ৺ཧ౷ܭ • ޮՌྔʹ͍ͭͯษڧ͢ΔͳΒ ඞಡ
ࢀߟจݙ • ͡Ίͯͷӳޠڭҭݚڀ • ݚڀͷೖޱΛղઆ͢ΔҰɻ ࠓͷ༰ୈ6ষΛิ͢ Δͷ
1. σʔλͷࢹ֮Խʢਤࣔʣ 2. σʔλͷཁʢத৺ͱΒ͖ͭʣ 3. ޮՌྔ • ࠩͷେ͖͞Λද͢ d
• ؔͷڧ͞Λද͢ r 4. ༗ҙੑݕఆʢਪଌ౷ܭʣ 5. jamovi ͱ langtest.jp Ken Urano
[email protected]
https://www.urano-ken.com/research/let2019 ֎ࠃޠڭҭʢݚڀʣʹ͓͚Δ ྔతσʔλͷࢹ֮Խͱղऍ
ࢀߟจݙ • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the
behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. • ೆ෩ݪே. (2002). ʰ৺ཧ౷ܭֶͷجૅ: ౷߹తཧղͷͨΊʹʱ౦ژ: ༗൹ֳ. • લాܒ࿕ɾࢁޫཅ (ฤ). (2004). ʰӳޠڭࢣͷͨΊͷڭҭσʔλੳೖ: तۀ͕มΘ ΔςετɾධՁɾݚڀʱ౦ژ: େमؗॻళ. • ਫຊಞɾཧ. (2008). ʮݚڀจʹ͓͚ΔޮՌྔͷใࠂͷͨΊʹ: جૅత֓೦ͱҙ ʯʰӳޠڭҭݚڀʱୈ31߸, 57–66. http://www.mizumot.com/files/ EffectSize_KELES31.pdf • Navarro, D. J., & Foxcroft, D. R. (2019). Learning statistics with jamovi: A tutorial for psychology students and other beginners. (Version 0.70). doi: 10.24384/hgc3-7p15 ʢࣳా࢘༁. jamoviͰֶͿ৺ཧ౷ܭ. https://bookdown.org/sbtseiji/lswjamoviJ/ʣ • େٱอ֗ѥɾԬాݠհ. (2012). ʰ͑ΔͨΊͷ৺ཧ౷ܭ: ޮՌྔɾ৴པ۠ؒɾݕఆྗʱ ౦ژ: Ⴛॻ. • Plonsly, L., & Oswald, F. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912. doi: 10.1111/lang.12079 • ཧɾਫຊಞ (ฤ). (2014). ʰ֎ࠃޠڭҭݚڀϋϯυϒοΫ: ݚڀख๏ͷΑΓྑ͍ཧղ ͷͨΊʹ (վగ൛)ʱ౦ژ: দദࣾ. • ӜݚɾཧཅҰɾాதɾ౻ాɾ∁ѥرࢠɾञҪӳथ. (2016). ʰ͡Ίͯͷ ӳޠڭҭݚڀ: ԡ͓͖͍͑ͯͨ͞ίπͱϙΠϯτʱ౦ژ: ݚڀࣾ. • ٢ాण. (1998). ʰຊʹΘ͔Γ͍͘͢͢͝େͳ͜ͱ͕ॻ͍ͯ͋Δ͘͝ॳาͷ౷ܭ ͷຊʱژ: େ࿏ॻ.