The social ontological foundations of immanent critique

Colloquium Philosophy and the Social Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic, May 2008

Transcript

1. The social ontological foundations of immanent critique The social ontological foundations of immanent critique Titus Stahl stahl@em.uni-frankfurt.de Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universit¨ at Frankfurt a. M., Germany Colloquium Philosophy and the Social Sciences Prague, May 14-18, 2008 Titus Stahl JWG-Universit¨ at Frankfurt
2. The social ontological foundations of immanent critique Types of social criticism Types of social criticism 1 Internal criticism: explicitly acknowledged norms 2 External criticism 3 Immanent criticism: norms, not explicitly acknowledged, but implicit in practice But what does it exactly mean that norms are implicit in social practice? Titus Stahl JWG-Universit¨ at Frankfurt
3. The social ontological foundations of immanent critique Possible candidates for grounding implicit norms Unsuccessful candidates for sources of implicit normativity Explicit beliefs Regularities of behavior Dispositions Conclusion: No facts about individuals are sufficient to ground implicit normativity. Better idea: Norms are implicit in social interactions ⇒ Social pragmatism Titus Stahl JWG-Universit¨ at Frankfurt
4. The social ontological foundations of immanent critique Social pragmatism I “The basic idea of social pragmatism is to look for the existence of normativity not in the raw behavior of individuals, but in the normative reactions they exhibit towards each other’s behavior, in their second-order behavior. In normative reactions we can not only see what kind of behavior a community exhibits, but also what kind of behavior it takes itself to exhibit, and therefore, how people classify their behavior.” Titus Stahl JWG-Universit¨ at Frankfurt
5. The social ontological foundations of immanent critique Social pragmatism II What a community takes its norms to be can consequently be discovered by how it treats its normative behavior, that is, by looking at the normative reactions to normative reactions. ⇒ Conceiving social norms as web of reinforcing normative attitudes allows to explain historical development of normative structures. Titus Stahl JWG-Universit¨ at Frankfurt
6. The social ontological foundations of immanent critique Social pragmatism III: Three problems of social pragmatism Three problems of simple social pragmatism: Individualist bias Conformist bias Does not account for reflexive structure of normativity Titus Stahl JWG-Universit¨ at Frankfurt
7. The social ontological foundations of immanent critique Introducing collective attitudes I The individualist bias can be solved by understanding sanctions as expression of a collective attitude A collective attitude should be understood as mutual normative commitment to a shared standard Notion of recognition Titus Stahl JWG-Universit¨ at Frankfurt
8. The social ontological foundations of immanent critique Introducing collective attitudes II Recognition Recognition is a mutual ascription of default (but not absolute) authority of evaluation between members of a community by virtue of which they can exhibit collective attitudes A recognition theory of immanent normativity can also integrate 1 problem of conformism (→ default-and-challenge structure) 2 problem of reflexivity (→ discursive practices) Titus Stahl JWG-Universit¨ at Frankfurt
9. The social ontological foundations of immanent critique The method of immanent critique I If immanent norms are constituted by recognition, immanent norms are the second-level norms which show up in social attitudes towards normative behaviour such attitudes express what people practically take their norms to be immanent norms can be sociologically discovered and studied Titus Stahl JWG-Universit¨ at Frankfurt
10. The social ontological foundations of immanent critique The method of immanent critique II Types of immanent critique 1 simple disagreement between immanent and explicit norms: critic makes immanent norms explicit 2 conflicting or inconsistent immanent normative attitudes: critic must look for social source of deformation and engage in dialogue Titus Stahl JWG-Universit¨ at Frankfurt
11. The social ontological foundations of immanent critique The method of immanent critique III This model can also be used to justify demands for the realization of the material presuppositions of normativity criticism of reified forms of normative practice in any community which takes itself to be a normative community. Titus Stahl JWG-Universit¨ at Frankfurt
12. The social ontological foundations of immanent critique stahl@em.uni-frankfurt.de Titus Stahl JWG-Universit¨ at Frankfurt