8 PEOPLE SPEND AN INCREASINGLY AMOUNT OF TIME ON THE PHONE […] REACHING 3 HOURS PER DAY THERE ARE 2.1M APPS IN THE GOOGLE PLAY STORE App usage statistics by Statista.com & hubspot.net
9 PEOPLE SPEND AN INCREASINGLY AMOUNT OF TIME ON THE PHONE […] REACHING 3 HOURS PER DAY THERE ARE 2.1M APPS IN THE GOOGLE PLAY STORE App usage statistics by Statista.com & hubspot.net USER ENGAGMENT INCREASED BY 23%
28 • Apps used at least twice and for at least 10 min per week • 20 weeks long sliding windows (1 week) • How does the App space evolve over time? The familiar apps over time: the App space THE APP SPACE (t) THE APP SPACE (t-1) THE APP SPACE (t+1) 1 WEEK 1 WEEK
40 •Local shuffle: app usage order of a user •If the random permutated user has the same capacity => Time •Two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test •Set p-value threshold (0.05 or 0.001?) - Different (p-value < threshold) - Don’t know (p-value > threshold) Is capacity a time-constraints consequence? ! " # $ USER A # $ ! " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolmogorov%E2%80%93Smirnov_test
41 •Local shuffle: app usage order of a user No time consequence (KS: 0.55 p-value < 0.001). •Global: app usage among users (KS: 0.98 p-value < 0.001). It’s an individual characteristics. Is capacity a time-constraints consequence? ! " # $ USER A # $ ! " ! " # $ USER A ! " # $ ! " # $ USER B ! " # $
48 People are focused on few apps, but keep exploring. Individuals exhibit a conserved app capacity •Capacity is an individual behaviour •Capacity varies with age •We can define app explorers and keepers •AND MORE! So?